Cinta de Moebio 68:156-166 (2020)

Authors
Abstract
Resumen: La aproximación que Durkheim esboza en Las Reglas es en la actualidad más bien criticada: sería una visión conservadora, que olvida la importancia de los agentes y una sociología de lo social que solo observa el orden establecido. Sin embargo, una lectura atenta de Las Reglas muestra que sus afirmaciones básicas -que es un hecho social, que debe ser visto como una cosa, y que debe buscarse su explicación a través de otros hechos sociales- son correctas y pueden integrar los elementos válidos de las críticas realizadas. Detrás del rechazo a Durkheim aparece el rechazo a una afirmación radical de Las Reglas que nos resulta más bien intolerable: que la imposición es parte natural de la vida social.: The approach that Durkheim delineates in The Rules of Sociological Method is currently criticized: it is a conservative view that forgets the relevance of agents and it is a social sociology that only observes established order. However, an intensive reading of The Rules shows that their basic statements -about what is a social fact, that they should be treated as things, and that their explanation should be searched in other social facts- are correct one and they can integrate the correct elements argued by its critics. Behind the rejection to Durkheim there is the rejection to a radical statement in The Rules, one that is unbearable for us: that coercion is a natural part of social life.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories No categories specified
(categorize this paper)
DOI 10.4067/s0717-554x2020000200156
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 58,834
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Les règLes de la méthode sociologique.Émile Durkheim - 1894 - Revue Philosophique de la France Et de l'Etranger 38:14-39.
Humanising Sociological Knowledge.Marcus Morgan - 2016 - Social Epistemology 30 (5-6):555-571.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Emile Durkheim.Prof Kenneth Thompson - 1919 - Revue de Philosophie 26:128.
Denken Over de Maatschappij AlS Empirische Wetenschap.J. M. G. Thurlings - 1972 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 34 (4):643 - 679.
Durkheim, Morals and Modernity. [REVIEW]M. J. Gane - 1998 - Dialogue 37 (4):826-827.
DURKHEIM, EMILE. The Rules of Sociological Method. [REVIEW]Harry Alpert - 1938 - Journal of Social Philosophy and Jurisprudence 4:184.
Dos Reglas del Método.Sergio Fernandez - 1998 - Cinta de Moebio 4.
Wittgenstein, Durkheim, Garfinkel and Winch: Constitutive Orders of Sensemaking.Anne Warfield Rawls - 2011 - Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 41 (4):396-418.
Durkheim, Bernard and Epistemology. [REVIEW]O. B. T. - 1981 - Review of Metaphysics 35 (1):139-140.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-10-06

Total views
4 ( #1,220,546 of 2,426,000 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #544,761 of 2,426,000 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes