A Hypothetical Learning Progression for Quantifying Phenomena in Science

Science & Education 28 (9-10):1181-1208 (2019)

In this article, we report on a three-pronged effort to create a hypothetical learning progression for quantification in science. First, we drew from history and philosophy of science to define the quantification competency and develop hypothetical levels of the learning progression. More specifically, the quantification competency refers to the ability to analyze phenomena through abstracting relevant measurable variables from phenomena and observations, investigating the mathematical relationships among the variables, and conceptualizing scientific ideas that explain the mathematical relationships. The quantification learning progression contains four levels of increasing sophistication: level 1, holistic observation; level 2, attributes; level 3, measurable variables; and level 4, relational complexity. Second, we analyzed the practices in the Next Generation Science Standards for current, largely tacit, assumptions about how quantification develops through K-12 education. While several pieces of evidence support the learning progression, we found that quantification was described inconsistently across practices. Third, we used empirical student data from a field test of items in physical and life sciences to illustrate qualitative differences in student thinking that align with levels in the hypothetical learning progression for quantification. By generating a hypothetical learning progression for quantification, we lay the groundwork for future standards development efforts to include this key practice and provide guidance for curriculum developers and instructors in helping students develop robust scientific understanding.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11191-019-00076-8
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,223
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

From Covariation to Causation: A Causal Power Theory.Patricia W. Cheng - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):367-405.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Aristotle on Hypothetical Necessity and Irreducibility.David Charles - 1988 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 69 (1):1.
The Rôle of Form in Learning.J. P. Guilford - 1927 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 10 (5):415.
The Credentials of Brain-Based Learning.Andrew Davis - 2004 - Philosophy of Education 38 (1):21-36.
Learning and Synaptic Plasticity.G. B. Robinson - 1997 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 20 (4):628-628.


Added to PP index

Total views
1 ( #1,379,403 of 2,285,686 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #837,842 of 2,285,686 )

How can I increase my downloads?


Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.

My notes

Sign in to use this feature