Croatian Journal of Philosophy 17 (1):33-43 (2017)

Authors
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin
De La Salle University
Abstract
Bayesianism has been dubbed as the most adequate and successful theory of scientific rationality. Its success mainly lies in its ability to combine two mutually exclusive elements involved in the process of theory-selection in science, viz.: the subjective and objective elements. My aim in this paper is to explain and evaluate Bayesianism’s account of scientific rationality by contrasting it with two other accounts.
Keywords Analytic Philosophy  Contemporary Philosophy
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s) 1333-1108
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,229
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Scientific Rationality.Michael Bert Kruse - 1996 - Dissertation, The University of Wisconsin - Madison
Bayesian Scientific Methodology: A Naturalistic Approach.Yeongseo Yeo - 2002 - Dissertation, University of Missouri - Columbia
Plantinga e a justificação Bayesiana de crenças.Agnaldo Cuoco Portugal - 2012 - Veritas – Revista de Filosofia da Pucrs 57 (2):15-25.
Bayesianism and the Rationality of Scientific Inference. [REVIEW]Jon Dorling - 1972 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 23 (2):181-190.
Two Dogmas of Strong Objective Bayesianism.Prasanta S. Bandyopadhyay & Gordon Brittan - 2010 - International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 24 (1):45 – 65.
Consensus in Science.Miriam Solomon - 2001 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2001:193-204.
How to Be a Bayesian Dogmatist.Brian T. Miller - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 94 (4):766-780.
Racionalidad y progreso deI desarrollo científico.León Olivé - 1992 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 7 (1-3):41-56.
In Defence of Objective Bayesianism.Jon Williamson - 2010 - Oxford University Press.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-06-29

Total views
9 ( #928,476 of 2,455,489 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,205 of 2,455,489 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes