Authors
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin
De La Salle University
Abstract
In “A neglected reply to Prior’s dilemma” Beall [2012] presents a Weak Kleene framework where Prior’s dilemma for Hume’s no-ought-fromis thesis fails. It fails in the framework because addition, the inference rule that one of its horns relies on, is invalid. In this paper, we show that a more general result is necessary for the viability of Beall’s proposal – a result, which implies that Hume’s thesis holds in the proposed framework. We prove this result and thus show that Beall’s proposal is indeed viable.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.12775/llp.2019.028
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 64,132
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Autonomy of Ethics.A. N. Prior - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38 (3):199 – 206.
Off-Topic: A New Interpretation of Weak-Kleene Logic.Jc Beall - 2016 - Australasian Journal of Logic 13 (6).
Barriers to Implication.Gillian Russell & Greg Restall - 2010 - In Charles Pigden (ed.), Hume on Is and Ought. Palgrave MacMillan.
The Autonomy of Ethics.A. Prior - 1960 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 38:197.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

De Camp, L. S., The Bronze God of Rhodes. [REVIEW]Beall Beall - 1959 - Classical World: A Quarterly Journal on Antiquity 53:232.
True and False–as If. Ch. 12 of G. Priest, Jc Beall and B. Armour-Garb.Jc Beall - 2004 - In Graham Priest, Jc Beall & Bradley P. Armour-Garb (eds.), The Law of Non-Contradiction : New Philosophical Essays. Oxford University Press.
Truth Pluralism and Many-Valued Logics: A Reply to Beall.Christine Tappolet - 2000 - Philosophical Quarterly 50 (200):382-385.
Spandrels of Truth.J. C. Beall - 2009 - Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Too Good to Be “Just True”.Marcus Rossberg - 2013 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 2 (1):1-8.
On Beall’s New Interpretation of $$WK_{3}$$ W K 3.Nissim Francez - 2019 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 28 (1):1-7.
What Are Beall and Restall Pluralists About?Nicole Wyatt - 2004 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 82 (3):409 – 420.
On the Pluralistic Conception of Logic.Zoltán Vecsey - 2010 - Pragmatics and Cognition 18 (1):1-16.
End of Inclosure.Jc Beall - 2014 - Mind 123 (491):829-849.
Lp+, K3+, Fde+, and Their 'Classical Collapse'.Jc Beall - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):742-754.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2019-07-22

Total views
13 ( #748,800 of 2,454,713 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #449,768 of 2,454,713 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes