Dissolving the Is-Ought problem: An essay on moral reasoning


Authors
Jeremiah Joven Joaquin
De La Salle University
Abstract
The debate concerning the proper way of understanding, and hence solving, the “is-ought problem” produced two mutually exclusive positions. One position claims that it is entirely impossible to deduce an imperative statement from a set of factual statements. The other position holds a contrary view to the effect that one can naturally derive an imperative statement from a set of factual statements under certain conditions. Although these two positions have opposing views concerning the problem, it should be evident that they both accept that the “is-ought problem” is concerned with the deducibility of imperative statements from factual statements. Later I will argue that this should not be our concern when we try to make sense of the way we reason about morality.
Keywords moral reasoning
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Problem of Protocol Statements and Schlick's Concept of "Konstatierungen".Zhenming Zhai - 1990 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1990:15 - 23.
Legal Statements and Normative Language.Duarte D'Almeida Luís - 2011 - Law and Philosophy 30 (2):167-199.
Natural Laws and the Problem of Provisos.Marc Lange - 1993 - Erkenntnis 38 (2):233Ð248.
The Moral Evil Demons.Ralph Wedgwood - 2010 - In Richard Feldman & Ted A. Warfield (eds.), Disagreement. Oxford University Press.
Reasoning and Pragmatics.Guy Politzer & Laura Macchi - 2000 - Mind and Society 1 (1):73-93.
Problem Representation for Refinement.Halil A. Guvenir & Varol Akman - 1992 - Minds and Machines 2 (3):267-282.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-02-05

Total views
1,927 ( #925 of 2,272,229 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
181 ( #2,420 of 2,272,229 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature