Is Hobbes Really an Antirealist about Accidents?

Authors
Sahar Joakim
Saint Louis University
Abstract
In Metaphysical Themes, Robert Pasnau interprets Thomas Hobbes as an anti-realist about all accidents in general. In opposition to Pasnau, we argue that Hobbes is a realist about some accidents (e.g., motion and magnitude). Section One presents Pasnau’s position on Hobbes; namely, that Hobbes is an unqualified anti-realist of the eliminativist sort. Section Two offers reasons to reject Pasnau’s interpretation. Hobbes explains that magnitude is mind-independent, and he offers an account of perception in terms of motion (understood as a mind-independent feature of body). Therefore, it seems incorrect to call Hobbes an anti-realist about all accidents. Section Three considers Pasnau’s hypothetical response: he might claim that for Hobbes, motion reduces to body and does not exist in its own right. Section Four notes that reductionism about all accidents does not entail anti-realism about all accidents. Even granting Pasnau’s anticipated response, his anti-realist reading does not follow. Contra Pasnau, Hobbes is best understood as claiming that motion and magnitude exist mind-independently.
Keywords Hobbes   Pasnau   antirealism about accidents   body   motion
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.31820/ejap.14.2.2
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 37,965
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Leibniz' Briefe an Hobbes.Karl Schuhmann - 2005 - Studia Leibnitiana 37 (2):147 - 160.
Hobbes: Metaphysics and Method.Stewart D. R. Duncan - 2003 - Dissertation, Rutgers the State University of New Jersey - New Brunswick
Does Hobbes Have a Concept of the Enemy?Stephen Holmes - 2010 - Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy 13 (2-3):371-389.
Galileo, Hobbes, and the Book of Nature.Douglas Michael Jesseph - 2004 - Perspectives on Science 12 (2):191-211.
Hobbes’ Anti-Liberal Individualism.James Martel - 2016 - Las Torres de Lucca: Revista Internacional de Filosofía Política 5 (9):31-59.
Hobbes and Political Realism.Robin Douglass - 2016 - European Journal of Political Theory:147488511667748.
Hobbes Studies : A Bibliography.[author unknown] - forthcoming - Book.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2018-12-15

Total views
6 ( #710,522 of 2,312,278 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #109,109 of 2,312,278 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature