- New
-
Topics
- All Categories
- Metaphysics and Epistemology
- Value Theory
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Science, Logic, and Mathematics
- Logic and Philosophy of Logic
- Philosophy of Biology
- Philosophy of Cognitive Science
- Philosophy of Computing and Information
- Philosophy of Mathematics
- Philosophy of Physical Science
- Philosophy of Social Science
- Philosophy of Probability
- General Philosophy of Science
- Philosophy of Science, Misc
- History of Western Philosophy
- Philosophical Traditions
- Philosophy, Misc
- Other Academic Areas
- Journals
- Submit material
- More
The Apnea Test: Requiring Consent for a Test That is a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy, Not Fit for Purpose, and Always Confounded?
American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):42-44 (2020)
Abstract
Volume 20, Issue 6, June 2020, Page 42-44.Author's Profile
My notes
Similar books and articles
To what extend is the going concern judgment influenced by the self-fulfilling prophecy?Andrés Guiral-Contreras, Emiliano Ruiz-Barbadillo & Waymond Rodgers - unknown
When peers are not peers and don't know it: The Dunning‐Kruger effect and self‐fulfilling prophecy in peer‐review.Sui Huang - 2013 - Bioessays 35 (5):414-416.
Effect test spaces and effect algebras.Stanley Gudder - 1997 - Foundations of Physics 27 (2):287-304.
Taken by surprise: The paradox of the surprise test revisited. [REVIEW]Joseph Y. Halpern & Yoram Moses - 1986 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 15 (3):281 - 304.
Genetic testing without consent: the implications of the new Human Tissue Act 2004.A. Lucassen & J. Kaye - 2006 - Journal of Medical Ethics 32 (12):690-692.
Minors and informed consent in carrier testing: a survey of European clinical geneticists.P. Borry, L. Stultiens, T. Goffin, H. Nys & K. Dierickx - 2008 - Journal of Medical Ethics 34 (5):370-374.
To test or not to test: A clinical dilemma.David B. Resnik - 1995 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 16 (2).
Discipline, subjectivity and personality: an analysis of the manuals of four psychological tests.Maarten Derksen - 2001 - History of the Human Sciences 14 (1):25-47.
Analytics
Added to PP
2020-05-23
Downloads
18 (#808,169)
6 months
8 (#352,434)
2020-05-23
Downloads
18 (#808,169)
6 months
8 (#352,434)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
Statement in Support of Revising the Uniform Determination of Death Act and in Opposition to a Proposed Revision.D. Alan Shewmon - 2021 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 48 (5):453-477.
The Brain Death Criterion in Light of Value-Based Disagreement Versus Biomedical Uncertainty.Ivar R. Hannikainen, Gonzalo Díaz-Cobacho & Daniel Martin - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):123-126.
Brain Death Testing: Time for National Uniformity.Thaddeus Mason Pope - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):1-3.
Ethical Issues in Death by Neurologic Criteria Require Critical Scrutiny: Lack of Engagement with Sound Arguments to Save Medical Dogma.Ari R. Joffe - 2024 - American Journal of Bioethics 24 (1):121-123.
Response to Open Peer Commentaries “Rethinking the Ethical, Legal, and Clinical Foundations of Informed Consent and Shared Decision-Making for Brain Death Determination”.Jeremy R. Garrett & Ivor Berkowitz - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):W1-W5.
References found in this work
Legal and Ethical Considerations for Requiring Consent for Apnea Testing in Brain Death Determination.Ivor Berkowitz & Jeremy R. Garrett - 2020 - American Journal of Bioethics 20 (6):4-16.
Toward a reconstruction of medical morality: The primacy of the act of profession and the fact of illness.Edmund D. Pellegrino - 1979 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 4 (1):32-56.
Whole-brain death and integration: realigning the ontological concept with clinical diagnostic tests.Daniel P. Sulmasy - 2019 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 40 (5):455-481.
The Limits of Surrogates’ Moral Authority and Physician Professionalism: Can the Paradigm of Palliative Sedation Be Instructive?Jeffrey T. Berger - 2017 - Hastings Center Report 47 (1):20-23.
Brain Death at Fifty: Exploring Consensus, Controversy, and Contexts.Robert D. Truog, Nancy Berlinger, Rachel L. Zacharias & Mildred Z. Solomon - 2018 - Hastings Center Report 48 (S4):2-5.
PhilPapers logo by Andrea Andrews and Meghan Driscoll.
This site uses cookies and Google Analytics (see our terms & conditions for details regarding the privacy implications). Use of this site is subject to terms & conditions.
All rights reserved by The PhilPapers Foundation
Server: philpapers-web-7c76586df8-4c2ch uwo