In recent years, a series of bestselling atheist manifestos by Sam Harris, Richard Dawkins, and Christopher Hitchens has thrust the topic of the rationality of religion into the public discourse. Christian moderates of an intellectual bent and even some agnostics and atheists have taken umbrage and lashed back. In this paper I defend the New Atheists against three common charges: that their critiques of religion commit basic logical fallacies (such as straw man, false dichotomy, or hasty generalization), that their own atheism is just as “faith-based” as the religious beliefs they criticize, and that their expressed disrespect for religious belief is immoral
Keywords Atheism  Dawkins, Richard  Harris, Sam  Hitchens, Christopher  Irrationality  New Atheism
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/s11153-012-9350-9
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 54,410
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Judgement and Justification.William G. Lycan - 1988 - Cambridge University Press.
Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism.Michael Ruse - 1984 - Journal of the History of Biology 17 (1):147-148.

View all 12 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

New Atheism and its Critics.Whitley Kaufman - 2019 - Philosophy Compass 14 (1):e12560.
Atheism and Epistemic Justification.J. Angelo Corlett & Josh Cangelosi - 2015 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 78 (1):91-106.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
174 ( #52,537 of 2,371,804 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
5 ( #160,567 of 2,371,804 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes