History and Philosophy of Logic 18 (1):1-15 (1997)
John Corcoran?s natural deduction system for Aristotle?s syllogistic is reconsidered.Though Corcoran is no doubt right in interpreting Aristotle as viewing syllogisms as arguments and in rejecting Lukasiewicz?s treatment in terms of conditional sentences, it is argued that Corcoran is wrong in thinking that the only alternative is to construe Barbara and Celarent as deduction rules in a natural deduction system.An alternative is presented that is technically more elegant and equally compatible with the texts.The abstract role assigned by tradition and Lukasiewicz to Barbara and Celarent is retained.The two ? perfect syllogisms? serve as ?basic elements? in the construction of an inductively defined set of valid syllogisms.The proposal departs from Lukasiewicz, and follows Corcoran, however, in construing the construction as one in natural deduction.The result is a sequent system with fewer rules and in which Barbara and Celarent serve as basic deductions.To compare the theory to Corcoran?s, his original is reformulated in current terms and generalized.It is shown to be equivalent to the proposed sequent system, and several variations are discussed.For all systems mentioned, a method of Henkin?style completeness proofs is given that is more direct and intuitive than Corcoran?s original
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Elements of Formal Semantics: An Introduction to Logic for Students of Language.John N. Martin - 1987 - Academic Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Aristotle's Syllogistic and Core Logic.Neil Tennant - 2014 - History and Philosophy of Logic 35 (2):120-147.
Logics for the Relational Syllogistic.Ian Pratt-hartmann & Lawrence S. Moss - 2009 - Review of Symbolic Logic 2 (4):647-683.
Proclus and the Neoplatonic Syllogistic.John N. Martin - 2001 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 30 (3):187-240.
Distributive Terms, Truth, and thePort Royal Logic.John N. Martin - 2013 - History and Philosophy of Logic 34 (2):133-154.
An Intensional Leibniz Semantics for Aristotelian Logic.Klaus Glashoff - 2010 - Review of Symbolic Logic 3 (2):262-272.
Similar books and articles
Two Natural Deduction Systems for Hybrid Logic: A Comparison. [REVIEW]Torben Braüner - 2004 - Journal of Logic, Language and Information 13 (1):1-23.
A Natural Deduction System for First Degree Entailment.Allard Tamminga & Koji Tanaka - 1999 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 40 (2):258-272.
Sequent Calculus in Natural Deduction Style.Sara Negri & Jan von Plato - 2001 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 66 (4):1803-1816.
The Deduction Rule and Linear and Near-Linear Proof Simulations.Maria Luisa Bonet & Samuel R. Buss - 1993 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 58 (2):688-709.
Some Formal Considerations on Gabbay's Restart Rule in Natural Deduction and Goal-Directed Reasoning.Michael Gabbay & Murdoch J. Gabbay - 2005 - In We Will Show Them! Essays in Honour of Dov Gabbay, volume 1. pp. 701-null.
The Geometry of Non-Distributive Logics.Greg Restall & Francesco Paoli - 2005 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 70 (4):1108 - 1126.
A Labelled Natural Deduction System for Linear Temporal Logic.Andrzej Indrzejczak - 2003 - Studia Logica 75 (3):345 - 376.
A Double Deduction System for Quantum Logic Based on Natural Deduction.Yannis Delmas-Rigoutsos - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 26 (1):57-67.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads26 ( #194,922 of 2,164,295 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #348,039 of 2,164,295 )
How can I increase my downloads?