Aristotle on the Unity of Touch

Journal of the History of Philosophy 59 (1):23-43 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Aristotle is history’s most famous and influential proponent of the view that there are exactly five senses. But was he entitled to hold this view, given his other commitments? In particular, was he entitled to treat touch as a single sense, given the diversity of its correlated objects? In this paper I argue that Aristotle wished to individuate touch on the basis of its correlated objects, just as he had the other four senses. I also argue, contrary to what is often supposed, that he was well-placed to do so, given his other commitments and views.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

What is Touch?Matthew Ratcliffe - 2012 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 90 (3):413 - 432.
Aristotle on Odour and Smell.Mark A. Johnstone - 2012 - Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy 43:143-83.
Touch Without Touching.Matthew Fulkerson - 2012 - Philosophers' Imprint 12.
Thermal Perception and its Relation to Touch.Richard Gray - 2023 - Philosophers' Imprint 23 (25).
Touch and Flesh in Aristotle’s de Anima.Rebecca Steiner Goldner - 2011 - Epoché: A Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (2):435-446.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-01-16

Downloads
553 (#39,673)

6 months
320 (#7,557)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Mark Johnstone
McMaster University

Citations of this work

Touch and Bodily Transparency.Vivian Mizrahi - 2023 - Mind 132 (527):803-827.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Some remarks about the senses.H. P. Grice - 1962 - In R. J. Butler (ed.), Analytical Philosophy, First Series. Oxford University Press.
The significance of the senses.Matthew Nudds - 2004 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 104 (1):31-51.
Touch.Frédérique de Vignemont & Olivier Massin - 2015 - In Mohan Matthen (ed.), The Oxford Handbook of the Philosophy of Perception. New York, NY: Oxford University Press UK.
Epiphenomenalisms, ancient and modern.Victor Caston - 1997 - Philosophical Review 106 (3):309-363.

View all 12 references / Add more references