Philosophy 47 (180):125 - 139 (1972)
Although his subject matter is far from abstract and his arguments comparatively free from obscurity, Bernard Mandeville has generally been acknowledged a difficult philosopher. It is not hard to see why. First, Mandeville deliberately sets out to generate paradoxes. Secondly, he is not a systematic writer. His views are expounded and developed in a number of works of which The Fable of the Bees is only the best known. Thirdly, and most important, he is not solely a philosopher, but also a satirist. His satire is intertwined with his purely philosophical theories and his style is often highly ironic. Any interpretation of Mandeville must consider his philosophical and his satirical intentions
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Social Thought of Bernard Mandeville.Irwin Primer - 1979 - International Studies in Philosophy 11:223-225.
Book Review:The Fable of the Bees. Bernard Mandeville, F. B. Kaye. [REVIEW]C. M. Perry - 1926 - Ethics 36 (4):431-.
Who Rebutted Bernard Mandeville?Jennifer Welchman - 2007 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 24 (1):57 - 74.
The Social and Political Thought of Bernard Mandeville.Malcolm Jack - 1987 - Garland.
The Fable of the Bees, or, Private Vices, Publick Benefits.Bernard Mandeville - 1732 - Liberty Classics.
Bernard Mandeville and the Therapy of "The Clever Politician&Quot.Harold John Cook - 1999 - Journal of the History of Ideas 60 (1):101-124.
A Letter to Dion, 1732.Bernard Mandeville - 1953 - Los Angeles, William Andrews Clark Memorial Library, University of California.
Pride, Hypocrisy and Civility in Mandeville's Social and Historical Theory.Laurence Dickey - 1990 - Critical Review 4 (3):387-431.
Added to index2010-08-10
Total downloads17 ( #283,493 of 2,168,628 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #346,836 of 2,168,628 )
How can I increase my downloads?