8. Conclusion

In A Theory of Physical Probability. University of Toronto Press. pp. 233-234 (2002)

Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3138/9781442670501-008
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 46,405
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Two Types of Multiple-Conclusion Systems.A. Avron - 1998 - Logic Journal of the IGPL 6 (5):695-718.
In Defence of Repugnance.Michael Huemer - 2008 - Mind 117 (468):899-933.
Probability and Scepticism.Brian Weatherson - 2014 - In Dylan Dodd Elia Zardini (ed.), Scepticism and Perceptual Justification. Oxford University Press. pp. 71-86.
Faith and the Existence of God: R. G. Swinburne.R. G. Swinburne - 1988 - Royal Institute of Philosophy Supplement 24:121-143.
Does the Repugnant Conclusion Have Any Probative Force?Christopher Cowie - 2017 - Philosophical Studies 174 (12):3021-3039.
Some Multi-Conclusion Modal Paralogics.Casey McGinnis - 2007 - Logica Universalis 1 (2):335-353.
Negative Average Preference Utilitarianism.Roger Chao - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Life 2 (1):55-66.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2017-01-11

Total views
2 ( #1,298,731 of 2,286,272 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #848,598 of 2,286,272 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature