In Walter Carnielli (ed.), Paraconsistency:the logical way to the inconsistent. pp. 141-150 (2002)

Frederick Johnson
Colorado State University
Consequence rleations over sets of "judgments" are defined by using "overdetermined" as well as "underdetermined" valuations. Some of these relations are shown to be categorical. And generalized soundness and completeness results are given for both multiple and single conclusion consequence relations.
Keywords judgments  consequence relations  soundness  completeness  multiple-conclusion
Categories (categorize this paper)
Buy the book Find it on
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Canonical Rules.Emil Jeřábek - 2009 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 74 (4):1171 - 1205.
Yes, Virginia, There Really Are Paraconsistent Logics.Bryson Brown - 1999 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 28 (5):489-500.
Aggregation and Idempotence.Lloyd Humberstone - 2013 - Review of Symbolic Logic 6 (4):680-708.
Some Supervaluation-Based Consequence Relations.Philip Kremer & Michael Kremer - 2003 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 32 (3):225-244.
Logical Opposition and Collective Decisions.Srećko Kovač - 2012 - In Jean-Yves Béziau & Dale Jacquette (eds.), Around and Beyond the Square of Opposition. Springer. pp. 341--356.
Biconsequences.Szymon Frankowski - 2010 - Logic and Logical Philosophy 19 (4):353-364.


Added to PP index

Total views
266 ( #36,652 of 2,454,957 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
12 ( #54,312 of 2,454,957 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes