Utilitas 12 (3):307 (2000)
This paper examines T. H. Green's and Henry Sidgwick's differing views of desireand the will, and connectedly, their differing views of an individual's good and freedom. It is argued that Sidgwick makes effective criticisms of Green, but that important elements in Green's idealist view of an individual's good and freedom survive the criticism and remain significant today. It is also suggested that Sidgwick's own account of an individual's good is unclear in an important way
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Green and Sidgwick on the Community of the Good.G. F. Barbour - 1908 - Philosophical Review 17 (2):149-166.
Green, Bradley and Sidgwick.T. H. Irwin - 2010 - In John Skorupski (ed.), The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Routledge.
Green and the Idealist Conception of a Person's Good.John Skorupski - 2006 - In Maria Dimova-Cookson & W. J. Mander (eds.), T.H. Green: Ethics, Metaphysics, and Political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Sidgwick on Ethical Judgment.John Deigh - 1992 - In Bart Schultz (ed.), Essays on Henry Sidgwick. Cambridge University Press.
Utilitarian Practical Ethics: Sidgwick and Singer.Anthony Skelton - 2011 - In Placido Bucolo, Roger Crisp & Bart Schultz (eds.), Henry Sidgwick: Ethics, Psychics, and Politics. Catania: University of Catania Press.
Lectures on the Ethics of T.H. Green, Mr. Herbert Spencer, and J. Martineau.Henry Sidgwick - 1902 - Thoemmes Press.
Added to index2010-08-30
Total downloads42 ( #122,762 of 2,164,539 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #188,462 of 2,164,539 )
How can I increase my downloads?