Science and Engineering Ethics 22 (4):989-1005 (2016)

Abstract
Drawing on 171 in-depth interviews with physicists at universities in the United States and the UK, this study examines the narratives of 48 physicists to explain the concept of ethical ambiguity: the border where legitimate and illegitimate conduct is blurred. Researchers generally assume that scientists agree on what constitutes both egregious and more routine forms of misconduct in science. The results of this study show that scientists perceive many scenarios as ethically gray, rather than black and white. Three orientations to ethical ambiguity are considered—altruism, inconsequential outcomes, and preserving the status quo—that allow possibly questionable behavior to persist unchallenged. Each discursive strategy is rationalized as promoting the collective interest of science rather than addressing what is ethically correct or incorrect. The results of this study suggest that ethics training in science should focus not only on fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism and more routine forms of misconduct, but also on strategies for resolving ethically ambiguous scenarios where appropriate action may not be clear.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s11948-015-9682-9
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,194
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Changing the Paradigm for Engineering Ethics.Jon Alan Schmidt - 2014 - Science and Engineering Ethics 20 (4):985-1010.

View all 7 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

From Shame Towards an Ethics of Ambiguity.Ruth Kitchen - 2013 - Sartre Studies International 19 (1):55-70.
Jaffray’s Ideas on Ambiguity.Peter P. Wakker - 2011 - Theory and Decision 71 (1):11-22.
Darwin's Ambiguity: The Secularization of Biological Meaning.David Kohn - 1989 - British Journal for the History of Science 22 (2):215-239.
A Generalization of Specker's Theorem on Typical Ambiguity.Richard Kaye - 1991 - Journal of Symbolic Logic 56 (2):458-466.
Ambiguous Democracy and the Ethics of Psychoanalysis.Yannis Stavrakakis - 1997 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 23 (2):79-96.
On Religious Ambiguity.Robert Mckim - 2008 - Religious Studies 44 (4):373-392.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2015-07-14

Total views
18 ( #585,819 of 2,448,320 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #450,727 of 2,448,320 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes