Philosophical Quarterly 61 (244):496-517 (2011)
Using the controversy over the MMR vaccine, I consider the reasons why non-experts should defer to experts, and I sketch a model for understanding cases where they fail to defer. I first suggest that an intuitively plausible model of the expert/non-expert relationship is complicated by shifting epistemic standards. One possible moderate response to this challenge, based on a more complex notion of non-experts' relationship with experts, seems unappealing as an account of the MMR controversy. A more radical suggestion is that non-experts might have a political reason to defer to experts, when not doing so will involve ‘epistemological free-riding’. I investigate the implications
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Taking Facts Seriously: Judicial Intervention in Public Health Controversies.Leticia Morales - 2015 - Public Health Ethics 8 (2):185-195.
Challenging the Moral Status of Blood Donation.Paul C. Snelling - 2012 - Health Care Analysis (4):1-26.
Similar books and articles
The Epistemic Authority of Expertise.Robert Pierson - 1994 - PSA: Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association 1994:398 - 405.
Expert Judgement and Expert Disagreement.Jeryl L. Mumpower & Thomas R. Stewart - 1996 - Thinking and Reasoning 2 (2 & 3):191 – 212.
Institutional Constraints on the Ethics of Expert Testimony.Bruce D. Sales & Leonore Simon - 1993 - Ethics and Behavior 3 (3 & 4):231 – 249.
Idealizing Science and Demonizing Experts: An Intellectual History of Expert Evidence.Jennifer Mnookin - manuscript
Character and Knowledge: Learning From the Speech of Experts. [REVIEW]Christopher W. Tindale - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):341-353.
Expertise, Argumentation, and the End of Inquiry.Axel Gelfert - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):297-312.
Expert Statistical Testimony and Epidemiological Evidence: The Toxic Effects of Lead Exposure on Children.Richard Scheines - unknown
Authenticating Expertise.Jason Borenstein - 2002 - International Journal of Applied Philosophy 16 (1):85-102.
Whom to Trust? Public Concerns, Late Modern Risks, and Expert Trustworthiness.Geert Munnichs - 2004 - Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 17 (2):113-130.
When Experts Argue: Explaining the Best and the Worst of Reasoning. [REVIEW]Hugo Mercier - 2011 - Argumentation 25 (3):313-327.
Added to index2010-12-01
Total downloads106 ( #45,457 of 2,152,647 )
Recent downloads (6 months)6 ( #119,810 of 2,152,647 )
How can I increase my downloads?