First Come, First Served?

Ethics 130 (2):179-207 (2020)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Waiting time is widely used in health and social policy to make resource allocation decisions, yet no general account of the moral significance of waiting time exists. We provide such an account. We argue that waiting time is not intrinsically morally significant, and that the first person in a queue for a resource does not ipso facto have a right to receive that resource first. However, waiting time can and sometimes should play a role in justifying allocation decisions. First, there is a duty of fairness prohibiting line-cutting where a sufficiently just queue exists. Second, waiting time has several morally attractive features that can justify its incorporation into allocation schemes. Where candidates are in relevantly similar circumstances, allocating by waiting time is relatively efficient, maximizes distribution equality relative to other Pareto efficient distributions, and treats candidates fairly. The claim that allocation using waiting time is fair is controversial. Some have claimed that formal lotteries are a fairer way to select among equal beneficiaries. We argue that lotteries are no fairer than allocation based on waiting time when it is equiprobable how a prospective queue will be ordered. In practice, lotteries share many of the disadvantages of queues; which is fairer will depend on contingent features of the allocation scenario. The upshot is that first-come, first-served is in fact a just way to allocate resources in many of the cases where it seems pre-theoretically compelling, and waiting time has unique normative properties which frequently justify its incorporation into resource allocation schemes.

Similar books and articles

Fair Kidney Allocation Based on Waiting Time.Matthias Hild - 2001 - Analyse & Kritik 23 (2):173-190.
On waiting.Harold Schweizer - 2008 - New York: Routledge.
Nurse time as a scarce health care resource.Donna Dickenson - 1994 - In Geoffrey Hunt (ed.), Ethical issues in nursing. London: Routledge. pp. 207-217.
The waiting game: an essay on the gift of time.Andrea Köhler - 2011 - New York: Upper West Side Philosophers.
Distributive Justice in Kidney Allocation.Thomas Schmidt - 2001 - Analyse & Kritik 23 (2):286-298.


Added to PP

1,658 (#4,218)

6 months
377 (#1,719)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tyler John
Longview Philanthropy
Joseph Millum
University of St. Andrews

References found in this work

A Theory of Justice: Revised Edition.John Rawls - 1999 - Harvard University Press.
Are there any natural rights?H. L. A. Hart - 1955 - Philosophical Review 64 (2):175-191.
Contractualism and Social Risk.Johann Frick - 2015 - Philosophy and Public Affairs 43 (3):175-223.
Fairness.John Broome - 1991 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 91:87 - 101.

View all 21 references / Add more references