Globalization and Health 8:19 (2012)
AbstractABSTRACT: BACKGROUND: The governments and citizens of the developed nations are increasingly called upon to contribute financially to health initiatives outside their borders. Although international development assistance for health has grown rapidly over the last two decades, austerity measures related to the 2008 and 2011 global financial crises may impact negatively on aid expenditures. The competition between national priorities and foreign aid commitments raises important ethical questions for donor nations. This paper aims to foster individual reflection and public debate on donor responsibilities for global health. METHODS: We undertook a critical review of contemporary accounts of justice. We selected theories that: (i) articulate important and widely held moral intuitions; (ii) have had extensive impact on debates about global justice; (iii) represent diverse approaches to moral reasoning; and (iv) present distinct stances on the normative importance of national borders. Due to space limitations we limit the discussion to four frameworks. RESULTS: Consequentialist, relational, human rights, and social contract approaches were considered. Responsibilities to provide international assistance were seen as significant by all four theories and place limits on the scope of acceptable national autonomy. Among the range of potential aid foci, interventions for health enjoyed consistent prominence. The four theories concur that there are important ethical responsibilities to support initiatives to improve the health of the worst off worldwide, but offer different rationales for intervention and suggest different implicit limits on responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS: Despite significant theoretical disagreements, four influential accounts of justice offer important reasons to support many current initiatives to promote global health. Ethical argumentation can complement pragmatic reasons to support global health interventions and provide an important foundation to strengthen collective action.
Similar books and articles
Responsibility for global health.Allen Buchanan & Matthew DeCamp - 2005 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 27 (1):95-114.
Global Health Justice and Governance.Jennifer Prah Ruger - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):35-54.
Responses to Open Peer Commentaries on “Global Health Justice and Governance”.Jennifer Prah Ruger - 2012 - American Journal of Bioethics 12 (12):W6-W8.
Global Health Justice and the Right to Health.Heather Widdows - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (4):391-400.
Global Child Health Ethics: Testing the Limits of Moral Communities.A. E. Denburg - 2010 - Public Health Ethics 3 (3):239-258.
In Search of Global Health Justice: A Need to Reinvigorate Institutions and Make International Law.Shawn H. E. Harmon - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (4):352-375.
Defining “Global Health Ethics”: Offering a Research Agenda for More Bioethics and Multidisciplinary Contributions—From the Global South and Beyond the Health Sciences—to Enrich Global Health and Global Health Ethics Initiatives.Catherine Myser - 2015 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry 12 (1):5-10.
Imagining Global Health with Justice: In Defense of the Right to Health.Eric A. Friedman & Lawrence O. Gostin - 2015 - Health Care Analysis 23 (4):308-329.
Global Health Governance and the Challenge of Chronic, Non-Communicable Disease.Roger S. Magnusson - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):490-507.
A Framework to Link International Clinical Research to the Promotion of Justice in Global Health.Bridget Pratt & Bebe Loff - 2013 - Bioethics 27 (3):387-396.
Humanity and Justice in Global Health: Problems with Venkatapuram's Justification of the Global Health Duty.Eszter Kollar, Sebastian Laukötter & Alena Buyx - 2016 - Bioethics 30 (1):41-48.
Responsibilities for Global Health: The Efficiency of the Health Impact Fund?V. Paivansalo - 2009 - Public Health Ethics 2 (1):100-104.
Global Health Governance: Commission on Social Determinants of Health and the Imperative for Change.Ruth Bell, Sebastian Taylor & Michael Marmot - 2010 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 38 (3):470-485.
Global Health Priority-Setting: Beyond Cost-Effectiveness.Ole F. Norheim, Ezekiel J. Emanuel & Joseph Millum (eds.) - 2019 - Oxford University Press.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Severe Poverty as a Violation of Negative Duties.Thomas Pogge - 2005 - Ethics and International Affairs 19 (1):55-83.
Human rights and global health: A research program.Thomas W. Pogge - 2005 - Metaphilosophy 36 (1‐2):182-209.
Responsibilities for Poverty-Related Ill Health.Thomas W. Pogge - 2002 - Ethics and International Affairs 16 (2):71-79.
On The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.Thomas Wayburn - 1998 - Essays in the Philosophy of Humanism 6.