How to allocate scarce health resources without discriminating against people with disabilities

Economics and Philosophy 33 (2):161-186 (2017)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

One widely used method for allocating health care resources involves the use of cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA) to rank treatments in terms of quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) gained. CEA has been criticized for discriminating against people with disabilities by valuing their lives less than those of non-disabled people. Avoiding discrimination seems to lead to the ’QALY trap’: we cannot value saving lives equally and still value raising quality of life. This paper reviews existing responses to the QALY trap and argues that all are problematic. Instead, we argue that adopting a moderate form of prioritarianism avoids the QALY trap and disability discrimination.

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 74,662

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Impartiality and Disability Discrimination.Greg Bognar - 2011 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (1):1-23.
Well-Being and Fairness in the Distribution of Scarce Health Resources.Re'em Segev - 2005 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 30 (3):231 – 260.
From Needs to Health Care Needs.Erik Gustavsson - 2013 - Health Care Analysis (1):1-14.
QALYfying the Value of Life.J. Harris - 1987 - Journal of Medical Ethics 13 (3):117-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-11-28

Downloads
1,089 (#6,107)

6 months
74 (#11,245)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Joseph Millum
University of St. Andrews
Tyler John
Longview Philanthropy