Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):379-391 (2013)
AbstractWhen considering the interactions between rhetoric and argumentation, readers of this journal will no doubt be reminded of the seminal work of Henry W. Johnstone Jr. (1959; 1978) who gathered both concerns together in ways that were designed to engage philosophers and persuade them of the intellectual seriousness of both enterprises. He was, of course, a principal force among those who brought Chaïm Perelman’s work to the attention of audiences in North America, and he himself entered into deep and fruitful dialogues with Perelman by way of reviewing the value that rhetoric brought to argumentation and logic, as well as to philosophy generally. His interest in philosophical argumentation prompted an early ..
Similar books and articles
Ways of being reasonable: Perelman and the philosophers.Christopher W. Tindale - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):337-361.
Con Amore: Henry Johnstone, Jr.'s Philosophy of Argumentation.James Crosswhite - 2001 - Informal Logic 21 (1).
The Role of Audience in Argumentation from the Perspective of Informal Logic.Ralph H. Johnson - 2013 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 46 (4):533-549.
Constrained Maneuvering: Rhetoric as a Rational Enterprise. [REVIEW]Christopher W. Tindale - 2006 - Argumentation 20 (4):447-466.
Perelman's Theory of Argumentation and Natural Law.I. I. I. Mootz - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):383.
Perelman, Informal Logic and the Historicity of Reason.Christopher W. Tindale - 2006 - Informal Logic 26 (3):341-357.
Choice is Not True or False: The Domain of Rhetorical Argumentation. [REVIEW]Christian Kock - 2009 - Argumentation 23 (1):61-80.
The brussels school of rhetoric: From the new rhetoric to problematology.Michel Meyer - 2010 - Philosophy and Rhetoric 43 (4):403-429.
Chaïm Perelman: Justice, argumentation and ancient rhetoric. [REVIEW]Alonso Tordesillas - 1990 - Argumentation 4 (1):109-124.
Being unreasonable: Perelman and the problem of fallacies. [REVIEW]James Crosswhite - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):385-402.
The conception of audience in Perelman and Isocrates: Locating the ideal in the real. [REVIEW]David Douglas Dunlap - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):461-474.
Some consequences ofThe New Rhetoric: A critical study. [REVIEW]Thomas M. Carr - 1993 - Argumentation 7 (4):475-479.
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Citations of this work
No citations found.
References found in this work
Rationality, Reasonableness, and Critical Rationalism: Problems with the Pragma-dialectical View. [REVIEW]Harvey Siegel & John Biro - 2008 - Argumentation 22 (2):191-203.
A pragma-dialectical response to objectivist epistemic challenges.Bart Garssen & Jan Albert van Laar - 2010 - Informal Logic 30 (2):122-141.