Aporia 19 (1):9-24 (2009)

Authors
Michael Alan Johnson
Georgia State University
Abstract
The purpose of this paper is to assess the general viability of Donald Davidson's paratactic theory of indirect discourse, as well as the specific plausibility of a reincarnated form of the Davidsonian paratactic theory, Gary Kemp's propositional paratactic theory. To this end I will provide an introduction to the Davidsonian paratactic theory and the theory's putative strengths, thereafter noting that an argument from ambiguity seems to effectively undermine Davidson's proposal. Subsequently, I will argue that Kemp's modification of Davidson's theory – that is, Kemp's attempt to respond to the ambiguity objection – adequately handles the classic argument from ambiguity but fails in the face of a new problem of ambiguity that I will introduce. Finally, I will argue that there are more devastating and basic problems for the paratactic theory generally, and that even if Kemp's modifications had succeeded, they would not have given adequate plausibility to the paratactic proposal.
Keywords Formal Semantics  Semantic Phenomena  Attitude Ascriptions  Donald Davidson  Intensionality and Opacity  Logical Form  Truth-Conditional Theories  Speech Reports  Indirect Discourse  Extensional Semantics
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Sense and Reference.Gottlob Frege - 1948 - Philosophical Review 57 (3):209-230.
On Saying That.Donald Davidson - 1968 - Synthese 19 (1-2):130-146.

View all 6 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Indirect Reports as Language Games.Alessandro Capone - 2012 - Pragmatics and Cognition 20 (3):593-613.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

What Davidson Should Have Said.Ernest LePore & Barry Loewer - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):65-78.
Indirect Speech, Parataxis and the Nature of Things Said.Julian Dodd - 1997 - Journal of Philosophical Research 22:211-227.
The Puzzle of Free Indirect Discourse.Yael Sharvit - 2008 - Linguistics and Philosophy 31 (3):353-395.
Truth Theories, Translation Manuals, and Theories of Meaning.Jeff Speaks - 2006 - Linguistics and Philosophy 29 (4):487 - 505.
Davidson and First-Person Authority: Parataxis and Self-Expression.Rockney Jacobsen - 2009 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 90 (2):251-266.
Indirect Speech Acts.Nicholas Asher & Alex Lascarides - 2001 - Synthese 128 (1-2):183 - 228.
Davidson on Convention.Dunja Jutronić-Tihomirović - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):121-132.
Davidson's Semantics and Computational Understanding of Language.Damjan Bojadžiev - 1989 - Grazer Philosophische Studien 36 (1):133-139.
The Expressive Role of Truth in Truth-Conditional Semantics.Claire Horisk - 2007 - Philosophical Quarterly 57 (229):535–557.
The Truth of Scientific Claims.Edward Mackinnon - 1982 - Philosophy of Science 49 (3):437-462.
Token-Reflexivity and Indirect Discourse.Manuel García-Carpintero - 2000 - The Proceedings of the Twentieth World Congress of Philosophy 2000:37-56.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-09-21

Total views
377 ( #18,014 of 2,344,123 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
21 ( #31,951 of 2,344,123 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes