Is the idea of objective probability incoherent?

Law and Philosophy 29 (4):419-432 (2010)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,219

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Objective probability-like things with and without objective indeterminism.László E. Szabó - 2007 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 38 (3):626-634.
Objective probability theory theory.Ellery Eells - 1983 - Synthese 57 (3):387 - 442.
A theory of probability.T. V. Reeves - 1988 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 39 (2):161-182.
Objective probability as a guide to the world.Michael Strevens - 1999 - Philosophical Studies 95 (3):243-275.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-04-18

Downloads
56 (#274,303)

6 months
7 (#350,235)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

The Reasonableness in Recklessness.Findlay Stark - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (1):9-29.
Taking Responsibility for Negligence and Non-negligence.Garrath Williams - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (1):113-134.
Recklessness Without the Risk.David Prendergast - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (1):31-50.
Recklessness Without the Risk.David Prendergast - 2020 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 14 (1):31-50.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references