Is Vague Identity Incoherent?

Analysis 49 (3):103 - 112 (1989)
Two purported proofs of the incoherence of vague identity are considered. First gareth evans's attempt is criticized and reformulated to overcome certain formal difficulties. Despite the reformulation, However, Evans's proof is demonstrated invalid in accord with a supervaluational approach. Next nathan salmon's attempt is evaluated. Here the problem is salmon's implicit assumption of a version of leibniz's law which is stronger than that strictly guaranteed by the law as it is given in classical logic. The question is raised on what grounds this stronger version is to be considered a logical law: without it the proof fails
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1093/analys/49.3.103
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 29,820
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Vagueness in the World.Ken Akiba - 2004 - Noûs 38 (3):407–429.
Qualia and Vagueness.Anthony Everett - 1996 - Synthese 106 (2):205-226.
Indeterminate Comprehension.Jonathan A. Simon - 2014 - Thought: A Journal of Philosophy 3 (1):39-48.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Added to PP index

Total downloads
83 ( #68,338 of 2,210,133 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #382,810 of 2,210,133 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature