Kaufman's response to Lucretius
Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 89 (4):470-485 (2008)
Abstract
Abstract: The symmetry argument is an objection to the 'deprivation approach'– the account of badness favored by nearly all philosophers who take death to be bad for the one who dies. Frederik Kaufman's recent response to the symmetry argument is a development of Thomas Nagel's suggestion that we could not have come into existence substantially earlier than we in fact did. In this paper, I aim to show that Kaufman's suggestion fails. I also consider several possible modifications of his theory, and argue that they are unsuccessful as well.Author's Profile
DOI
10.1111/j.1468-0114.2008.00331.x
My notes
Similar books and articles
Diesing and Piccone on Kaufman.Arnold S. Kaufman - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):211-216.
An answer to lucretius' symmetry argument against the fear of death.Frederik Kaufman - 1995 - Journal of Value Inquiry 29 (1):57-64.
Death, asymmetry and the psychological self.Glen Pettigrove - 2002 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 83 (4):407–423.
Playing the Odds: A New Response to Lucretius's Symmetry Argument.Jeremy R. Simon - 2010 - European Journal of Philosophy 18 (3):414-424.
The distributive justice theory of self-defense: A response to Whitley Kaufman.Re'em Segev - 2008 - Ethics and International Affairs 22 (1).
Late Birth, Early Death, and the Problem of Lucretian Symmetry.Frederik Kaufman - 2011 - Social Theory and Practice 37 (1):113-127.
Kaufman on alienation.Paul Diesing & Paul Piccone - 1967 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 10 (1-4):208-210.
Kaufman on art, family resemblances, and Wittgenstein.Ben Tilghman - 2008 - British Journal of Aesthetics 48 (1):86-88.
Death and deprivation; or, why lucretius' symmetry argument fails.Frederik Kaufman - 1996 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 74 (2):305 – 312.
Analytics
Added to PP
2009-01-28
Downloads
91 (#137,103)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
2009-01-28
Downloads
91 (#137,103)
6 months
1 (#452,962)
Historical graph of downloads
Author's Profile
Citations of this work
How A-theoretic deprivationists should respond to Lucretius.Natalja Deng - 2015 - Journal of the American Philosophical Association 1 (3):417-432.
Yet Another “Epicurean” Argument.Peter Finocchiaro & Meghan Sullivan - 2016 - Philosophical Perspectives 30 (1):135-159.