Veronica Johansson
Lund University
:Brain–computer interfaces can enable communication for persons in severe paralysis including locked-in syndrome ; that is, being unable to move or speak while aware. In cases of complete loss of muscle control, termed “complete locked-in syndrome,” a BCI may be the only viable solution to restore communication. However, a widespread ignorance regarding quality of life in LIS, current BCIs, and their potential as an assistive technology for persons in LIS, needlessly causes a harmful situation for this cohort. In addition to their medical condition, these persons also face social barriers often perceived as more impairing than their physical condition. Through social exclusion, stigmatization, and frequently being underestimated in their abilities, these persons are being locked out in addition to being locked-in. In this article, we show how persons in LIS are being locked out, including how key issues addressed in the existing literature on ethics, LIS, and BCIs for communication, such as autonomy, quality of life, and advance directives, may reinforce these confinements; show how these practices violate the United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities, and suggest that we have a moral responsibility to prevent and stop this exclusion; and discuss the role of BCIs for communication as one means to this end and suggest that a novel approach to BCI research is necessary to acknowledge the moral responsibility toward the end users and avoid violating the human rights of persons in LIS.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/s0963180117000081
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 71,489
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

View all 8 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Locked-in Happiness.Zac Alstin - 2011 - Bioethics Research Notes 23 (1):11.
Substance Un-Locked.R. J. Butler - 1974 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74:131 - 160.
Locked In.Megan Craig - 2008 - Journal of Speculative Philosophy 22 (3):pp. 145-158.
The Diving Bell Meets the Butterfly: Identity Lost Andre-Membered.Denise Dudzinski - 2001 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 22 (1):33-46.
VIII—Substance Un-Locked.R. J. Butler - 1974 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 74 (1):131-160.
Australia Locked Up [Book Review].Joanna Clyne - 2008 - Agora (History Teachers' Association of Victoria) 43 (4):74.
How's and Why's: Causation Un-Locked.Lois Frankel - 1990 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 7 (4):409 - 429.
All Ellas: Girls Locked Up.Bernardine Dohrn - 2004 - Feminist Studies 30 (2):302-324.


Added to PP index

Total views
37 ( #309,423 of 2,520,806 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,623 of 2,520,806 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes