Philosophical Psychology 28 (6):815-836 (2015)

Authors
Kent Johnson
University of California, Irvine
Abstract
Provided we agree about the thing, it is needless to dispute about the terms. —David Hume, A treatise of human nature, Book 1, section VIIMap-like representations are frequently invoked as an alternative type of representational vehicle to a language of thought. This view presupposes that map-systems and languages form legitimate natural kinds of cognitive representational systems. I argue that they do not, because the collections of features that might be taken as characteristic of maps or languages do not themselves provide scientifically useful information above and beyond what the individual features provide. To bring this out, I sketch several allegedly distinctive features of maps, and show how they can easily be grafted onto a simple logical language, resulting in a hybrid “manguage.” The ease with which these linguistic and map-like properties can be integrated into a single representational system raises the question of what work broader categories like language and map are doing. I maintain..
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1080/09515089.2014.893814
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 50,447
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

The Origin of Concepts.Susan Carey - 2009 - Oxford University Press.
Vison.David Marr - 1982 - W. H. Freeman.
The Language of Thought.Jerry A. Fodor - 1975 - Harvard University Press.

View all 84 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Belief.Eric Schwitzgebel - 2006 - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Mapas, Lenguaje y Conceptos: Hacia Una Teoría Pluralista Del Formato de Los Conceptos.Mariela Aguilera - 2020 - Principia: An International Journal of Epistemology 24 (1):121-146.
Talking Our Way to Systematicity.Léa Salje - 2019 - Philosophical Studies 176 (10):2563-2588.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Desiderata for Cognitive Architectures.Ron Sun - 2004 - Philosophical Psychology 17 (3):341-373.
Cognitive Architectures Have Limited Explanatory Power.Prasad Tadepalli - 2003 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 26 (5):622-623.
A Computational Framework for Concept Representation in Cognitive Systems and Architectures: Concepts as Heterogeneous Proxytypes.Antonio Lieto - 2014 - Proceedings of 5th International Conference on Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures, Boston, MIT, Pocedia Computer Science, Elsevier:1-9.
Toward a Unified View of Cognitive Control.Dario D. Salvucci & Niels A. Taatgen - 2011 - Topics in Cognitive Science 3 (2):227-230.
Basic Properties of Quantum Automata.Stanley Gudder - 2000 - Foundations of Physics 30 (2):301-319.
Conscious Cognition and Blackboard Architectures.Bernard J. Baars - 2006 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 29 (1):70-71.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-03-25

Total views
65 ( #141,396 of 2,326,499 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
6 ( #129,116 of 2,326,499 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes