Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 144-173 (2009)
I propose that a sociological and historical examination of nanotechnologists can contribute more to an understanding of nanotechnology than an ontological definition. Nanotechnology emerged from the convergent evolution of numerous "technical knowledge communities"-networks of tightly-interconnected people who operate between disciplines and individual research groups. I demonstrate this proposition by sketching the co-evolution of computational chemistry and computational nanotechnology. Computational chemistry arose in the 1950s but eventually segregated into an ab initio, basic research, physics-oriented flavor and an industry-oriented, molecular modeling and visualization, biochemical flavor. Computational nanotechnology arose in the 1990s as a synthesis of these two subgroups, infused by people and practices from computational materials science, engineering, computer science, and elsewhere. I show that to understand the aims and outcomes of computational nanotechnology-and nanotechnology more generally-we need to understand relationships between different, but related, nano knowledge communities and their dependence on particular practices, artifacts, and theories.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
Sanctioning Models: The Epistemology of Simulation.Eric Winsberg - 1999 - Science in Context 12 (2).
Simulations, Models, and Theories: Complex Physical Systems and Their Representations.Eric Winsberg - 2001 - Proceedings of the Philosophy of Science Association 2001 (3):S442-.
Handshaking Your Way to the Top: Simulation at the Nanoscale.Eric Winsberg - 2006 - Philosophy of Science 73 (5):582-594.
Citations of this work BETA
Beyond Implications and Applications: The Story of 'Safety by Design'. [REVIEW]M. Kelty Christopher - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):79-96.
Similar books and articles
What's Different, Ethically, About Nanotechnology?: Foundational Questions and Answers. [REVIEW]Robert E. McGinn - 2010 - NanoEthics 4 (2):115-128.
Can Nanotechnology Be Just? On Nanotechnology and the Emerging Movement for Global Justice.Andrew Jamison - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):129-136.
Southern Roles in Global Nanotechnology Innovation: Perspectives From Thailand and Australia. [REVIEW]Donald C. Maclurcan - 2009 - NanoEthics 3 (2):137-156.
Perception of Risk and Nanotechnology.E. Schuller - 2004 - In Baird D. (ed.), Discovering the Nanoscale. Ios.
Nanotechnology — a New Field of Ethical Inquiry?Armin Grunwald - 2005 - Science and Engineering Ethics 11 (2):187-201.
Invisible Origins of Nanotechnology: Herbert Gleiter, Materials Science, and Questions of Prestige.Alfred Nordmann - 2009 - Perspectives on Science 17 (2):pp. 123-143.
Introduction to Computational Cognitive Modeling.Ron Sun - 2008 - In The Cambridge Handbook of Computational Psychology. Cambridge University Press. pp. 3--19.
Gestalt Switch in Molecular Image Perception: The Aesthetic Origin of Molecular Nanotechnology in Supramolecular Chemistry. [REVIEW]Joachim Schummer - 2006 - Foundations of Chemistry 8 (1):53-72.
Added to index2009-04-25
Total downloads20 ( #242,936 of 2,153,861 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,861 )
How can I increase my downloads?