Multiple roles and successes in public bioethics: A response to the public forum critique of bioethics commissions
Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 16 (2):173-188 (2006)
: National bioethics commissions have been critiqued for a variety of structural, procedural, and political aspects of their work. A more recent critique published by Dzur and Levin uses political philosophy to constructively critique the work of national bioethics commissions as public deliberative forums. However, this public forum critique of bioethics commissions ignores empirical research in political science and normative claims that suggest that advisory commissions can and should have diverse of functions beyond that of being public forums. The present paper argues that the public forum critique too narrowly considers the roles that bioethics commissions can play in public bioethics and ignores the moral obligation of commissions to fulfill their mandates. Evaluations of commissions must consider that these institutions can serve in capacities other than those of a public deliberative forum and use additional measures to evaluate the multiple roles and successes of bioethics commissions in public policy
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
Three Ways to Politicize Bioethics.Mark B. Brown - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (2):43 – 54.
Ideology and Politicization in Public Bioethics.Summer Mcgee - 2011 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 20 (1):73-84.
Power and Representation of the Public's Values in a Social Implications of Research Commission.John H. Evans - 2011 - American Journal of Bioethics 11 (5):10-11.
Similar books and articles
National Bioethics Commissions and Partisan Politics.Udo Schuklenk - 2008 - Bioethics 22 (6):ii–iii.
Can National Bioethics Commissions Be Progressive? Should They?Eric M. Meslin - 2010 - In Jonathan D. Moreno & Sam Berger (eds.), Progress in Bioethics: Science, Policy, and Politics. MIT Press.
Australian Commissions and Committees on Issues in Bioethics.Peter Singer - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):403-424.
Public Engagement and Bioethics Commissions.Thomas H. Murray & Ross S. White - 2010 - In John Elliott, W. Calvin Ho & Sylvia S. N. Lim (eds.), Bioethics in Singapore: The Ethical Microcosm. World Scientific.
Promises and Perils of Public Deliberation: Contrasting Two National Bioethics Commissions on Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Cynthia B. Cohen - 2005 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 (3):269-288.
Commissions and Biomedical Ethics: The Canadian Experience.John R. Williams - 1989 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 14 (4):425-444.
The "Nation's Conscience:" Assessing Bioethics Commissions as Public Forums.Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin - 2004 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 14 (4):333-360.
Making Public Bioethics Sufficiently Public: The Legitimacy and Authority of Bioethics Commissions.Summer Johnson - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):143-152.
The Primacy of the Public: In Support of Bioethics Commissions as Deliberative Forums.Albert W. Dzur & Daniel Lessard Levin - 2007 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 17 (2):133-142.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads21 ( #238,063 of 2,171,881 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #326,616 of 2,171,881 )
How can I increase my downloads?