Thesis Eleven 101 (1):44-52 (1985)
Abstract |
The following discussion explores dimensions of feminism’s ongoing efforts to negotiate split normative claims. It attempts to push through a stalled debate within contemporary feminism by describing it as a mis-recognition of feminism’s double-sided normativity. It suggests that an ‘either/or’ construction of what feminism is about obscures the contribution that each can make to a clarification of the limitations and concealed entailments of the other. This investigation into the normative tensions within contemporary feminism will be illuminated in the second part of the article with reference to Maria Markus’s reflections in her major essay ‘Decent Society and/or Civil Society?’ on the intertwined normativities that form the ‘utopian horizon’ of modern democracies
|
Keywords | No keywords specified (fix it) |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Reprint years | 2010 |
ISBN(s) | |
DOI | 10.1177/0725513609360608 |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
Decent Society and/or Civil Society?Maria Markus - 2001 - Social Research: An International Quarterly 68.
Third Wave Feminism a Critical Exploration.S. Gillis, G. Howie & R. Munford - 2004 - Palgrave Macmillan.
View all 6 references / Add more references
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Analytics
Added to PP index
2013-11-03
Total views
52 ( #220,150 of 2,520,402 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,402 )
2013-11-03
Total views
52 ( #220,150 of 2,520,402 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #405,718 of 2,520,402 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads