Dissertation, Mcgill University (Canada) (1997)
Authors |
|
Abstract |
This thesis investigates Habermas's attempt to establish a credible form of universalism in moral and political philosophy by means of the theoretical approach which he terms "discourse ethics." The central question motivating this study is whether Habermas succeeds in this ambition. Discourse ethics specifies a procedure which purports to enable all agents involved in a conflict of interest in which issues of justice are at stake to come to a rational and cooperative resolution. It proposes a position unique among contemporary approaches to justice in the strength and character of its anti-relativist stance: the plurality of human cultures and the situated character of human understanding do not, according to this theory, bar the way to arriving at a minimal form of moral universalism. Although the procedure specified in communicative ethics elucidates only a narrow range of concerns--those pertaining to justice in the strict sense--it aims to do so in a way valid across all human cultures. ;Habermas's strategy for the defence of a species-wide moral universalism is, I argue, both the key feature of his position, and the least well understood. Discussion of discourse ethics to date has focussed almost exclusively on the question of its appropriateness to the context of modern, Western pluralism. An important reason for this focus has been the intricacy of Habermas's argumentative strategy, which links the recent work on discourse ethics to his longstanding project of developing a theory of communicative action. ;The principle aim of this thesis is to clarify Habermas's position by explicating his programme of justification. In so doing, I draw attention to several problems in his approach as a mechanism for cross-cultural conflict adjudication, and endeavour to provide a more perspicuous account of the relation of Habermas's theory to its main philosophical competitors, especially Rawlsian deontology, and contextualism
|
Keywords | Habermas ethics universalism justice pluralism |
Categories | (categorize this paper) |
Options |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Download options
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
The Moral Imaginary of Discourse Ethics.Kenneth MacKendrick - 2000 - Critical Horizons 1 (2):247-269.
Procedural Justice?: Implications of the Rawls-Habermas Debate for Discourse Ethics.Cristina Lafont - 2003 - Philosophy and Social Criticism 29 (2):163-181.
A Critique of the Universalist Theory of Ethical Justification: Habermas Vs. The Contextualist Point of View.In Tak Lee - 1991 - Dissertation, Indiana University
Consensus and Cognitivism in Habermas's Discourse.Darrel Moellendorf - 2000 - South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):65-74.
Kant, Hegel, and Habermas: Does Hegel's Critique of Kant Apply to Discourse Ethics?Matthew Miller - unknown
Justice and the Good Life: An Analysis and Defense of a Communicative Theory of Ethics.Mary Johanna Meehan - 1990 - Dissertation, Boston University
Moral Consciousness and Communicative Action: From Discourse Ethics to Spiritual Transformation.Ananta Kumar Giri - 1998 - History of the Human Sciences 11 (3):87-113.
Discourse Ethics: A Pragmatic Justification for Haberma's Moral Theory.Christopher Alistair Deabler - unknown
Consensus and Cognitivism in Habermas's Discourse Ethics.Darrel Moellendorf - 2000 - South African Journal of Philosophy 19 (2):65-74.
From Species Ethics to Social Concerns: Habermas’s Critique of “Liberal Eugenics” Evaluated.Vilhjálmur Árnason - 2014 - Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 35 (5):353-367.
Proceduralism and Justification in Habermas’s Discourse Ethics.Jon Mahoney - 2002 - Philosophy Today 46 (3):300-311.
Horse and Carriage: Why Habermas's Discourse Ethics Gives Virtue a Praxis in Social Work.Mel Gray & Terence Lovat - 2007 - Ethics and Social Welfare 1 (3):310-328.
Jürgen Habermas and Islamic Fundamentalism: On the Limits of Discourse Ethics.Vivienne Boon - 2010 - Journal of Global Ethics 6 (2):153-166.
Modernity and Morality in Habermas's Discourse Ethics.James Gordon Finlayson - 2000 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 43 (3):319 – 340.
Analytics
Added to PP index
2015-02-05
Total views
207 ( #54,679 of 2,498,779 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #23,525 of 2,498,779 )
2015-02-05
Total views
207 ( #54,679 of 2,498,779 )
Recent downloads (6 months)
37 ( #23,525 of 2,498,779 )
How can I increase my downloads?
Downloads