This paper looks at an approach to Principle C in which the disjoint reference effect triggered by definite description arises because there is a preference for using bound pronouns in those cases. Philippe Schlenker has linked this approach to the idea that the NP part of a definite description should be the most minimal in content relative to a certain communicative goal. On a popular view about what the syntax and semantics of a personal pronoun is, that should have the effect of favoring a pronoun over a definite description. This paper shows how that can be made the source of “Vehicle Change,” an effect in ellipsis contexts in which definite descriptions seem to behave like pronouns. It requires, however, a way of distinguishing bound pronouns from non-bound pronouns, and the paper makes a proposal about how these two kinds of pronouns can be distinguished in the way needed.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Translate to english
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,417
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Reference and Proper Names.Tyler Burge - 1973 - Journal of Philosophy 70 (14):425-439.
Binding Implicit Variables in Quantified Contexts.Barbara Partee - 1989 - In Caroline Wiltshire, Randolph Graczyk & Bradley Music (eds.), CLS. pp. 342-365.

View all 10 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Descriptions and Beyond.Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.) - 2004 - Oxford University Press.
Towards a Phenomenology of Pronouns.Tze-wan Kwan - 2007 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 15 (2):247 – 268.
Reference and Definite Descriptions.Keith S. Donnellan - 1966 - Philosophical Review 75 (3):281-304.
Pronouns and Definite Descriptions: A Critique of Wilson.Mandy Simons - 1996 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (8):408-420.
Essentially Indexical Bound Anaphoric Pronouns.Katrina Przyjemski - 2008 - Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 39:215-222.
Descriptions: Points of Reference.Kent Bach - 2004 - In Marga Reimer & Anne Bezuidenhout (eds.), Descriptions and Beyond. Clarendon Press. pp. 189-229.
Co-Extensive Theories and Unembedded Definite Descriptions.Alex Barber - 2005 - In Reinaldo Elugardo & Robert J. Stainton (eds.), Ellipsis and Nonsentential Speech. Springer. pp. 185–201.
Relational Nouns, Pronouns, and Resumption.Ash Asudeh - 2005 - Linguistics and Philosophy 28 (4):375 - 446.
Focusing Bound Pronouns.Clemens Mayr - 2012 - Natural Language Semantics 20 (3):299-348.


Added to PP index

Total views
56 ( #190,406 of 2,449,087 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #442,577 of 2,449,087 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes