Philosophy of Science 72 (4):557-583 (2005)

Authors
John Earman
University of Pittsburgh
Laura Ruetsche
University of Michigan, Ann Arbor
Abstract
A number of arguments have been given to show that the modal interpretation of ordinary nonrelativistic quantum mechanics cannot be consistently extended to the relativistic setting. We find these arguments inconclusive. However, there is a prima facie reason to think that a tension exists between the modal interpretation and relativistic invariance; namely, the best candidate for a modal interpretation adapted to relativistic quantum field theory, a prescription due to Rob Clifton, comes out trivial when applied to a number of systems of physical interest. However, it is far from clear whether this difficulty for the modal interpretation is traceable to relativistic invariance per se or to the infinite number of degrees of freedom involved. In any case, the proponents of the modal interpretation have work to do.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1086/505448
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 63,219
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.Olimpia Lombardi & Dennis Dieks - forthcoming - Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
Entropy - A Guide for the Perplexed.Roman Frigg & Charlotte Werndl - 2011 - In Claus Beisbart & Stephan Hartmann (eds.), Probabilities in Physics. Oxford University Press. pp. 115-142.
Why Be Normal?Laura Ruetsche - 2011 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 42 (2):107-115.

View all 8 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Chasing Chimeras.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2009 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 60 (3):635-646.
Modal Interpretations and Relativity.Wayne C. Myrvold - 2002 - Foundations of Physics 32 (11):1773-1784.
Thoroughly Relativistic Perspectives.Mark Ressler - 2012 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 53 (1):89-112.
Two No-Go Theorems for Modal Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics.E. P. - 1999 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 30 (3):403-431.
Is There Really No Projection Postulate in the Modal Interpretation?W. Michael Dickson - 1995 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 46 (2):197-218.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total views
86 ( #124,870 of 2,448,405 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
2 ( #304,192 of 2,448,405 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes