Read on relevance: a rejoinder

Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 25 (3):217-223 (1984)
Abstract This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1305/ndjfl/1093870627
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,300
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Implicational Paradoxes and the Meaning of Logical Constants.Francesco Paoli - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (4):553 – 579.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Burgess on Relevance: A Fallacy Indeed.Stephen Read - 1983 - Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24 (4):473-481.
A Rejoinder to the Danapur Rejoinder.Raymond Wilson - 1984 - British Journal of Educational Studies 32 (1):55 - 57.
The Transcendental Core of Correlationism.Paul Ennis - 2011 - Cosmos and History 7 (1):37-48.
Trite Arguments and Hypocrisy: A Rejoinder.Keith Burgess‐Jackson - 1997 - Criminal Justice Ethics 16 (2):8-10.
Added to PP index
2010-08-24

Total downloads
7 ( #535,088 of 2,193,232 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #290,647 of 2,193,232 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature