Stem Cells, Sex, and Procreation

Sex is not the answer to everything, though young men think it is, but it may be the answer to the intractable debate over the ethics of human embryonic stem cell research. In this paper, I advance one ethical principle that, as yet, has not received the attention its platitudinous character would seem to merit. If found acceptable, this principle would permit the beneficial use of any embryonic or fetal tissue that would, by default, be lost or destroyed. More important, I make two appeals to consistency, or to parity of reasoning, that I believe show that no one who either has used or intends to use sexual reproduction as their means of procreation, nor indeed anyone who has unprotected heterosexual intercourse, nor anyone who finds in vitro fertilization acceptable, nor anyone who believes that abortion is ever permissible can consistently object on principle to human embryo research nor to the use of embryonic stem cells for research or therapy
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1017/S096318010312405X
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Revision history
Request removal from index
Download options
Our Archive

Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 26,685
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA
Stem Cell Research on Embryonic Persons Is Just.Aaron Rizzieri - 2012 - Journal of Bioethical Inquiry (Browse Results) 9 (2):195-203.
Towards a Global Human Embryonic Stem Cell Bank.Jason P. Lott & Julian Savulescu - 2007 - American Journal of Bioethics 7 (8):37 – 44.
Advancing the Case for Organ Procurement.Jason Eberl - 2009 - American Journal of Bioethics 9 (8):22-23.
Therapeutic Cloning and Reproductive Liberty.Robert Sparrow - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 33 (2):1-17.

View all 7 citations / Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.Norman Ford - 2011 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 16 (4):4.
Stem Cells, Altered Nuclear Transfer & Ethics.Norman Ford - 2007 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (3):9.
Sweet Gifts: A Jewish Response to Gilbert Meilaender.Elie Spitz - 2001 - Journal of Religious Ethics 29 (1):19 - 23.
Social Experiments in Stem Cell Biology.Melinda B. Fagan - 2011 - Perspectives on Science 19 (3):235-262.
Stem Cell Technology Update.Mariam Ghosn & Ford - 2006 - Chisholm Health Ethics Bulletin 12 (1):10.
Moral Complicity in Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell Research.Mark T. Brown - 2009 - Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 19 (1):pp. 1-22.
The Ethics of Embryonic Stem Cell Research.Howard J. Curzer - 2004 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 29 (5):533 – 562.

Monthly downloads

Added to index


Total downloads

66 ( #78,465 of 2,158,385 )

Recent downloads (6 months)

2 ( #194,528 of 2,158,385 )

How can I increase my downloads?

My notes
Sign in to use this feature

There  are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.

Other forums