Sport-Related Neurotrauma and Neuroprotection: Are Return-to-Play Protocols Justified by Paternalism?

Neuroethics 8 (1):15-26 (2015)

Authors
L. Syd M Johnson
SUNY Upstate Medical University
Abstract
Sport-related neurotrauma annually affects millions of athletes worldwide. The return-to-play protocol is the dominant strategy adopted by sports leagues and organizations to manage one type of sport-related neurotrauma: concussions. RTPs establish guidelines for when athletes with concussions are to be removed from competition or practice, and when they can return. RTPs are intended to be neuroprotective, and to protect athletes from some of the harms of sport-related concussions, but there is athlete resistance to and noncompliance with RTPs. This prompts consideration of whether RTPs, as employed in adult, professional sports, are paternalistic, and if they are, whether they are objectionably so. If RTPs are uniquely effective at protecting current or future athlete autonomy, they might be justified by paternalism. I conclude that RTPs are paternalistic in their effects, but are not adequately justified, and thus they are objectionable
Keywords Return-to-play  Sports  Concussion  Neurotrauma  Paternalism  Autonomy  Consent  Football  CTE
Categories (categorize this paper)
ISBN(s)
DOI 10.1007/s12152-014-9213-4
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,461
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Intentional Rules Violations—One More Time.Warren P. Fraleigh - 2003 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 30 (2):166-176.
What Counts As Part of a Game? A Look at Skills.Cesar R. Torres - 2000 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 27 (1):81-92.
Consent and Right Action in Sport.Steven Weimer - 2012 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 39 (1):11-31.

View all 18 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The Reality of Fantasy Sports: A Metaphysical and Ethical Analysis.Chad Carlson - 2013 - Journal of the Philosophy of Sport 40 (2):187 - 204.
Paternalism in the Name of Autonomy.Manne Sjöstrand, Stefan Eriksson, Niklas Juth & Gert Helgesson - 2013 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 38 (6):jht049.
Play, Performance, and the Docile Athlete.Leslie A. Howe - 2007 - Sport, Ethics and Philosophy 1 (1):47 – 57.
Paternalism and Partial Autonomy.O. O'Neill - 1984 - Journal of Medical Ethics 10 (4):173-178.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2014-06-25

Total views
37 ( #239,973 of 2,280,298 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #309,960 of 2,280,298 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature