Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):75-90 (2004)
I have argued that because human sexual reproduction inevitably involves the creation and destruction of embryos, it is a problematic activity for those who believe that the embryo is “one of us.” Or, if it is not a problematic activity, then neither is the creation and destruction of embryos for a purpose of comparable moral seriousness—the development of lifesaving therapy, for example. I assume that, whereas it is possible for the very first act of unprotected intercourse to result in a live human baby, and hence not in a given case cause any embryo loss, this is a rare event and that, statistically, for every live birth from three to five embryos must be created only to die. For dramatic effect, I assume that five is a reasonable figure, giving each embryo a 20% chance of survival; however, nothing in the argument depends on any specific figures being correct. a
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Y and Z Are Not Off the Hook: The Survival Lottery Made Fairer.Mark T. Nelson - 2010 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 35 (4):396-401.
Therapeutic Homicide: A Philosophic and Halakhic Critique of Harris' 'Survival Lottery'.Sid Z. Leiman - 1983 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 8 (3):257-268.
The Creation Lottery: Final Lessons From Natural Reproduction: Why Those Who Accept Natural Reproduction Should Accept Cloning and Other Frankenstein Reproductive Technologies.Julian Savulescu & John Harris - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (1):90-95.
Environmental Change, Mutational Load and the Advantage of Sexual Reproduction.J. T. Manning & D. P. E. Dickson - 1986 - Acta Biotheoretica 35 (3):149-162.
The Survival of the Survival Lottery.C. J. Mcknight - 1996 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 13 (1):101-108.
The Ethics of Lottery Advertising: Issues and Evidence. [REVIEW]James M. Stearns & Shaheen Borna - 1995 - Journal of Business Ethics 14 (1):43 - 51.
Tinkering with the Survival Lottery During a Public Health Crisis.C. Herrera - 2009 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 34 (2):181-194.
Response to “The Creation Lottery” by Julian Savulescu and John Harris : The Creation Lottery and Method in Bioethics: A Comment on Savulescu and Harris. [REVIEW]Søren Holm - 2004 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 13 (3):283-287.
Analysing Population Numbers of the House Sparrow in the Netherlands with a Matrix Model and Suggestions for Conservation Measures.Chris Klok, Remko Holtkamp, Rob van Apeldoorn, Marcel E. Visser & Lia Hemerik - 2006 - Acta Biotheoretica 54 (3):161-178.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads38 ( #137,334 of 2,178,143 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #166,129 of 2,178,143 )
How can I increase my downloads?