David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Journal of Religious Ethics 28 (2):253 - 280 (2000)
By examining the theories of justice developed by Joseph Butler and David Hume, the author discloses the conceptual limits of their moral naturalism. Butler was unable to accommodate the possibility that justice is, at least to some extent, a social convention. Hume, who more presciently tried to spell out the conventional character of justice, was unable to carry through that project within the framework of his moral naturalism. These limits have gone unnoticed, largely because Butler and Hume have been misinterpreted, their relation misconstrued. Exegetes have persistently misunderstood the differences that divide them, have misconceived the notion of "public utility" in Hume's account of justice, have wrongly interpreted Butler as a forerunner of Immanuel Kant, and have altogether missed the degree to which Hume stands in the tradition of Thomas Aquinas
|Keywords||Hume convention Butler justice utility Aquinas|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Michael S. Pritchard (2008). Justice And Resentment In Hume, Reid, And Smith. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 6 (1):59-70.
Mark E. Yellin (2000). Indirect Utility, Justice, and Equality in the Political Thought of David Hume. Critical Review 14 (4):375-389.
Larry R. Churchill (1999). Looking to Hume for Justice: On the Utility of Hume's View of Justice for American Health Care Reform. Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 24 (4):352 – 364.
Jonathan Harrison (1980). Hume's Theory of Justice. Oxford University Press.
Sharon R. Krause (2004). Hume and the (False) Luster of Justice. Political Theory 32 (5):628-655.
Don Garrett (2007). The First Motive to Justice: Hume's Circle Argument Squared. Hume Studies 33 (2):257-288.
J. Salter (2012). Hume and Mutual Advantage. Politics, Philosophy and Economics 11 (3):302-321.
Lorraine Besser-Jones (2006). The Role of Justice in Hume's Theory of Psychological Development. Hume Studies 32 (2):253-276.
Kenneth R. Westphal (2010). From 'Convention' to 'Ethical Life': Hume's Theory of Justice in Post-Kantian Perspective. Journal of Moral Philosophy 7 (1):105-132.
Paul Russell (2004). Butler's "Future State" and Hume's "Guide of Life". Journal of the History of Philosophy 42 (4):425-448.
Terence Penelhum (1988). Butler and Hume. Hume Studies 14 (2):251-276.
Robert M. Stewart (1992). Butler's Argument Against Psychological Hedonism. Canadian Journal of Philosophy 22 (2):211-221.
Spencer J. Pack & Eric Schliesser (2006). Smith's Humean Criticism of Hume's Account of the Origin of Justice. Journal of the History of Philosophy 44 (1):47-63.
Dorothy P. Coleman (1988). Hume, Miracles and Lotteries. Hume Studies 14 (2):328-346.
Added to index2010-08-24
Total downloads21 ( #222,679 of 1,924,713 )
Recent downloads (6 months)2 ( #308,186 of 1,924,713 )
How can I increase my downloads?