Symbolic Versus Associative Learning

Cognitive Science 34 (6):958-965 (2010)

Abstract
Ramscar and colleagues (2010, this volume) describe the “feature-label-order” (FLO) effect on category learning and characterize it as a constraint on symbolic learning. I argue that FLO is neither a constraint on symbolic learning in the sense of “learning elements of a symbol system” (instead, it is an effect on nonsymbolic, association learning) nor is it, more than any other constraint on category learning, a constraint on symbolic learning in the sense of “solving the symbol grounding problem.”
Keywords Symbol grounding  Symbol systems  Symbolic learning  Relational representations  Relational learning
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01096.x
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 45,328
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

From Covariation to Causation: A Causal Power Theory.Patricia W. Cheng - 1997 - Psychological Review 104 (2):367-405.

View all 11 references / Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Computing Machinery and Understanding.Michael Ramscar - 2010 - Cognitive Science 34 (6):966-971.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP index
2010-08-11

Total views
47 ( #185,574 of 2,280,271 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
1 ( #831,075 of 2,280,271 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes

Sign in to use this feature