Synthese 156 (2):253 - 279 (2007)
The empirical nature of our understanding of language is explored. I first show that there are several important and different distinctions between tacit and accessible awareness. I then present empirical evidence concerning our understanding of language. The data suggests that our awareness of sentence-meanings is sometimes merely tacit according to one of these distinctions, but is accessible according to another. I present and defend an interpretation of this mixed view. The present project is shown to impact on several diverse areas, including inferential role semantics and holism, the nature of learning, and the role of linguistics in the law.
|Keywords||Cognitive science Psychology Linguistics Tacit knowledge Philosophy of language|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
The Adapted Mind: Evolutionary Psychology and the Generation of Culture.Jerome Barkow, Leda Cosmides & John Tooby (eds.) - 1992 - Oxford University Press.
Citations of this work BETA
Similar books and articles
A Clinical Perspective on Tacit Knowledge and Its Varieties.Stephen G. Henry - 2011 - Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):13-17.
Ineffable, Tacit, Explicable and Explicit.Charles Lowney - 2011 - Tradition and Discovery 38 (1):18-37.
Tacit Knowledge, Implicit Learning and Scientific Reasoning.Andrea Pozzali - 2007 - Mind and Society 7 (2):227-237.
Why Knowledge is Unnecessary for Understanding Language.Dean Pettit - 2002 - Mind 111 (443):519-550.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads70 ( #73,083 of 2,154,177 )
Recent downloads (6 months)15 ( #31,312 of 2,154,177 )
How can I increase my downloads?