The bridge connecting pontius pilate's sentencing of Jesus to the new jersey death penalty study commission's concerns over executing the innocent: When human beings with inherently human flaws determine guilt or innocence and life or death
The goal of this discussion is to use Pontius Pilate's sentencing of Jesus as a metaphor for our imperfect criminal justice system as it relates to capital punishment. There are few injustices that are more unacceptable than when an innocent defendant is convicted of a crime he did not commit. Such injustices are especially egregious when the defendant is wrongfully convicted of capital murder and faces execution. Such wrongful convictions can be attributed to a variety of reasons with one single denominator; we as humans are imperfect and the way we administer criminal justice is imperfect, Pilate, the Roman Governor of Judea sentenced an innocent Jesus to execution on the cross. The arrest, trial and sentencing of Jesus is instructive for 21st Century capital punishment jurisprudence. First, Jesus was innocent. Second, Jesus represented himself pro se with no legal representation. The trial of Jesus was less a trial and more a murder motivated by greed, ambition and dishonesty. Characteristics that are so inherently human. New Jersey's cutting edge decision to abolish capital punishment was a result of a report filed by the New Jersey Death Penalty study Commission. The Commission was very concerned with the very real possibility of executing an innocent capital defendant, in part because of the fact that simply, we as humans are as imperfect as our criminal justice system.
|Keywords||No keywords specified (fix it)|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Science and the Death Penalty: Dna, Innocence, and the Debate Over Capital Punishment in the United States.Jay D. Aronson & Simon A. Cole - unknown -
Desert, Justice and Capital Punishment.Patrick Lenta & Douglas Farland - 2008 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 2 (3):273-290.
Death as Punishment: An Analysis of Eight Arguments Against Capital Punishment.Dawinder S. Sidhu - manuscript -
Retributivist Arguments Against Capital Punishment.Thom Brooks - 2004 - Journal of Social Philosophy 35 (2):188–197.
Should the Death Penalty Be Abolished? Arguments for and Against the Centuries-Old Punishment.Adina Nicoleta Gavrilă - 2011 - Journal for Communication and Culture 1 (2):82-98.
Retributivism and the Inadvertent Punishment of the Innocent.Larry Alexander - 1983 - Law and Philosophy 2 (2):233 - 246.
Afterword: Proportionality and the Difference Death Makes.William A. Edmundson - 2002 - Criminal Justice Ethics 21 (2):40-43.
The "Race-of-the-Victim" Effect in Capital Sentencing: McClesky V. Kemp and Underadjustment Bias.William A. Edmundson - 1990 - Jurimetrics 32:125-41.
Added to index2009-01-28
Total downloads3 ( #671,810 of 2,019,589 )
Recent downloads (6 months)0
How can I increase my downloads?
There are no threads in this forum
Nothing in this forum yet.