Review of Metaphysics 62 (3):551-574 (2009)
This paper maintains that Hobbes grounds right and obligation in self-interest, and opposes a recent argument that for Hobbes obligation is grounded in the agent’s practical deliberation. In addition, it maintains that for Leibniz right and obligation are grounded in the moral-rational capacity of persons, but not in self-interest. It proceeds by distinguishing among the various senses of jus or “right,” and contrasting Hobbes’s and Leibniz’s understanding of the term—though both see it as a kind of freedom they differ fundamentally as to its kind. The little explored treatment of “right” that appears in Leibniz’s New Method for the Learning and Teaching of Jurisprudence is discussed in the course of the article. In conclusion, the article finds that for Leibniz, obligations are grounded in one’s moral capacity. One ought not to harm others because one is a rational being among others who hold the same rights and obligations. For Hobbes, obligations are grounded in self-preservation and maintained by external coercion. For Leibniz, right is the possibility of doing what is just, maintaining the rights and obligations of others; while for Hobbes, right is a problem for doing what is just—a problem for self-interested agents that requires an external solution
|Keywords||Catholic Tradition Contemporary Philosophy General Interest|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Leibniz on Hobbes's Materialism.Stewart Duncan - 2010 - Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A 41 (1):11-18.
Obligation and Advantage in Hobbes' Leviathan.Mark Peacock - 2010 - Canadian Journal of Philosophy 40 (3):433-458.
Taking Hobbes at His Word: Comments on Morality in the Philosophy of Thomas Hobbes by S.A. Lloyd.Rosamond Rhodes - 2010 - Hobbes Studies 23 (2):170-179.
Hobbes's Struggle with Contractual Obligation. On the Status of the Laws of Nature in Hobbes's Work.Matthias Kiesselbach - 2010 - Hobbes Studies 23 (2):105-123.
Hobbes, Universal Names, and Nominalism.Stewart Duncan - forthcoming - In Stefano Di Bella & Tad M. Schmaltz (eds.), The Problem of Universals in Early Modern Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
Hobbes's Theory of Rights – a Modern Interest Theory.Eleanor Curran - 2002 - Journal of Ethics 6 (1):63-86.
Obligation and Assent in Hobbes's Moral Philosophy.Rosamond Rhodes - 2002 - Hobbes Studies 15 (1):45-67.
Blinded by the Light of Hohfeld: Hobbes's Notion of Liberty.Eleanor Curran - 2010 - Jurisprudence 1 (1):85-104.
Is Political Obligation Necessary for Obedience? Hobbes on Hostility, War and Obligation.Thomas M. Hughes - 2012 - Teoria Politica 2:77-99.
Added to index2012-03-18
Total downloads20 ( #242,936 of 2,153,860 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #398,005 of 2,153,860 )
How can I increase my downloads?