The moral inefficacy of carbon offsetting

Australasian Journal of Philosophy (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX


Many real-world agents recognise that they impose harms by choosing to emit carbon, e.g., by flying. Yet many do so anyway, and then attempt to make things right by offsetting those harms. Such offsetters typically believe that, by offsetting, they change the deontic status of their behaviour, making an otherwise impermissible action permissible. Do they succeed in practice? Some philosophers have argued that they do, since their offsets appear to reverse the adverse effects of their emissions. But we show that they do not. In practice, standard carbon offsetting does not reverse the harms of the original action, nor does it even benefit the same group as was harmed. Standard moral theories hence deny that such offsetting succeeds. Indeed, we show that any moral theory that allows offsetting in this setting faces a dilemma between allowing any wrong to be offset, no matter how grievous, and recognising an implausibly sharp discontinuity between offsettable actions and non-offsettable actions. The most plausible response is to accept that carbon offsetting fails to right our climate wrongs.



External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Offsetting Harm.Michael Deigan - 2022 - In Oxford Studies in Normative Ethics, Volume 12.
The ethics of carbon offsetting.Keith Hyams & Tina Fawcett - 2013 - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 4 (2):91-98.
Moral Offsetting.Thomas Foerster - 2019 - Philosophical Quarterly 69 (276):617-635.
A Legacy of Harm? Climate Change and the Carbon Cost of Procreation.Daniel Burkett - 2021 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 38 (5):790-808.
Carbon Offsetting and Justice: A Kantian Response.Zachary Vereb - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):253-257.
Moral Dimensions of Offsetting Luxury Emissions.Adriana Placani & Stearns Broadhead - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):297-315.
Should I Offset or Should I Do More Good?H. Orri Stefansson - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):225-241.
The Most Good We Can Do or the Best Person We Can Be?Michel Bourban & Lisa Broussois - 2020 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 23 (2):159-179.
Why I Should Still Offset Rather Than Do More Good.Kritika Maheshwari - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):249-252.
Is There Any Virtue in Offsetting?Kevin Meeker - 2022 - Ethics, Policy and Environment 25 (3):258-260.
Fossil fuels.Kian Mintz-Woo - 2023 - In Benjamin Hale, Andrew Light & Lydia A. Lawhon (eds.), Routledge Companion to Environmental Ethics. New York: Routledge. pp. 317-326.


Added to PP

396 (#39,026)

6 months
277 (#3,981)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Tyler John
Longview Philanthropy
Amanda Askell
New York University
Hayden Wilkinson
Oxford University

Citations of this work

Carbon Offsetting.Dan Baras - forthcoming - Ethics, Policy and Environment.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references