Ethics and Global Politics 6 (1):1-24 (2013)

Authors
Aleksandar Jokic
Portland State University
Abstract
A step towards constructing an ethics of international activism is proposed by formulating a series of constraints on what would constitute morally permissible agency in the context that involves delivering services abroad, directly or indirectly. Perhaps surprisingly, in this effort the author makes use of the concept of ‘force multiplier’. This idea and its official applications have explanatory importance in considering the correlation between the post-Cold War phenomenal growth in the number of international non-governmental organizations and the emergence of the US as the sole, unchallenged superpower. Four moral constraints useful for morally assessing international activism are formulated and defended. The final outcome is an argument in favor of an overarching duty for any activist-minded Westerner to go local, while developing nations are urged to closely regulate, even criminalize, activities by international activists and ‘human rights organizations’ on their territory when not in solidarity or in support of local movements. The position defended, urging the normative primacy of local over international activism, also finds support in Immanuel Kant’s Third Definitive Article for A Perpetual Peace.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.3402/egp.v6i1.20017
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

The New Transnational Activism.Sidney G. Tarrow - 2005 - Cambridge University Press.
Defining Activism.Marcelo Svirsky - 2010 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 4 (Suppl):163-182.
Shareholder Activism.Maria Goranova & Lori Verstegen Ryan - 2012 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 23:160-169.
Global Players in the Local Field.Betty Dee Makani-Lim & Felix Chan Lim - 2009 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 4:59-81.
What's A Just War Theorist?Aleksandar Jokic - 2012 - Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Criminology 4 (2):91-114.
A Network Analysis of Shareholder Activism.Donald H. Schepers - 2007 - Proceedings of the International Association for Business and Society 18:351-356.
From International Corporate Responsibility to Local CSR.Vladimir Petkoski - 2007 - International Corporate Responsibility Series 3:283-295.
Activist Materialism.Dimitris Papadopoulos - 2010 - Deleuze and Guatarri Studies 4 (Suppl):64-83.
The Impossibility of Local Skepticism.Stephen Maitzen - 2006 - Philosophia 34 (4):453-464.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2013-04-12

Total views
301 ( #25,390 of 2,371,804 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
31 ( #24,170 of 2,371,804 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes