Cartesian or condillacian linguistics?

Topoi 4 (2):145-149 (1985)
Abstract
This paper intends to deal with Condillacian Linguistics. Although the Condillacian philosophy of mind and analysis of language were the most important in the late eighteenth century, none of them is mentioned in Chomsky's work (1966, Cartesian Linguistics). It would be useful for the history of Western thought if Chomsky's monumental error were generally recognized and if Condillacian Linguistics were at last to find the place it rightly deserves. The main thesis of Condillac's linguistic ideas (language is the first step in the analysis of thought) is briefly presented with reference to its context and consequences.
Keywords No keywords specified (fix it)
Categories (categorize this paper)
DOI 10.1007/BF00135841
Options
 Save to my reading list
Follow the author(s)
Edit this record
My bibliography
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Mark as duplicate
Request removal from index
Revision history
Download options
Our Archive


Upload a copy of this paper     Check publisher's policy     Papers currently archived: 30,370
Through your library
References found in this work BETA

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

Add more citations

Similar books and articles
Linguistics, Psychology, and the Ontology of Language.Fritz J. McDonald - 2009 - Croatian Journal of Philosophy 9 (3):291-301.
The Philosophy of Linguistics.Jerrold J. Katz (ed.) - 1985 - Oxford University Press.
Ignorance Radicalized.Gergo Somodi - 2009 - Studia Philosophica Estonica 2 (2):140-156.
Rethinking Linguistics.Hayley G. Davis - 2003 - Routledgecurzon.
Intuitions in Linguistics.Michael Devitt - 2006 - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 57 (3):481-513.
Added to PP index
2009-01-28

Total downloads
50 ( #107,643 of 2,193,788 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
4 ( #59,985 of 2,193,788 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Monthly downloads
My notes
Sign in to use this feature