Authors
Alan Rubel
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Abstract
Higher education institutions are mining and analyzing student data to effect educational, political, and managerial outcomes. Done under the banner of “learning analytics,” this work can—and often does—surface sensitive data and information about, inter alia, a student’s demographics, academic performance, offline and online movements, physical fitness, mental wellbeing, and social network. With these data, institutions and third parties are able to describe student life, predict future behaviors, and intervene to address academic or other barriers to student success (however defined). Learning analytics, consequently, raise serious issues concerning student privacy, autonomy, and the appropriate flow of student data. We argue that issues around privacy lead to valid questions about the degree to which students should trust their institution to use learning analytics data and other artifacts (algorithms, predictive scores) with their interests in mind. We argue that higher education institutions are paradigms of information fiduciaries. As such, colleges and universities have a special responsibility to their students. In this article, we use the information fiduciary concept to analyze cases when learning analytics violate an institution’s responsibility to its students.
Keywords higher education  privacy  learning analytics  information fiduciary  trust
Categories (categorize this paper)
Options
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

Data Analytics in Higher Education: Key Concerns and Open Questions.Alan Rubel & Kyle M. L. Jones - 2017 - University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy 1 (11):25-44.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles

Data Analytics in Higher Education: Key Concerns and Open Questions.Alan Rubel & Kyle M. L. Jones - 2017 - University of St. Thomas Journal of Law and Public Policy 1 (11):25-44.
Student Partnership, Trust and Authority in Universities.Morgan White - 2018 - Educational Philosophy and Theory 50 (2):163-173.
Reference Framework for Active Learning in Higher Education.Pranav Naithani - 2008 - In Abdulla Al-Hawaj, Wajeeh Elali & E. H. Twizell (eds.), Higher Education in the Twenty-First Century: Issues and Challenges. Taylor & Francis Group. pp. 113-120.
The Agora.Don Berkich - 2012 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 46 (4):379-390.
The Agora.Don Berkich - 2013 - Journal of Philosophy of Education 47 (3):379-390.
Big Data Privacy and Ethical Challenges.Paulette Lacroix - 2019 - In Mowafa Househ, Andre W. Kushniruk & Elizabeth M. Borycki (eds.), Big Data, Big Challenges: A Healthcare Perspective: Background, Issues, Solutions and Research Directions. Springer Verlag. pp. 101-111.

Analytics

Added to PP index
2020-07-22

Total views
317 ( #32,433 of 2,498,795 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
29 ( #30,264 of 2,498,795 )

How can I increase my downloads?

Downloads

My notes