Contiguity and reinforcement in relation to CS-UCS intervals in classical aversive conditioning

Psychological Review 69 (3):176-185 (1962)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

DOI

10.1037/h0049387

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 91,349

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

S-R contiguity and delay of reinforcement as critical parameters in classical aversive conditioning.Ernest N. Damianopoulos - 1967 - Psychological Review 74 (5):420-427.
Stimulus-response contiguity in classical aversive conditioning.R. A. Champion - 1962 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 64 (1):35.
Classical aversive conditioning of human digital volume-pulse change and tests of the preparatory-adaptive-response interpretation of reinforcement.John J. Furedy & Anthony N. Doob - 1971 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 89 (2):403.
Classical eyelid conditioning as a function of sustained and shifted interstimulus intervals.Harvey C. Ebel & William F. Prokasy - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (1):52.
Attempted pupillary conditioning at four stimulus intervals.Ernest R. Hilgard, Charles E. Dutton & John S. Helmick - 1949 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 39 (5):683.
The partial-reinforcement effect sustained through blocks of continuous reinforcement in classical eyelid conditioning.Sally L. Perry & John W. Moore - 1965 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 69 (2):158.
Feedforward versus feedbackward: An ethological alternative to the law of effect.R. Allen Gardner & Beatrix T. Gardner - 1988 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 11 (3):429.
Heart rate and somatic-motor coupling during classical aversive conditioning in humans.Paul A. Obrist - 1968 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 77 (2):180.
Effects of unconditioned stimulus intensity and schedules of 50% partial reinforcement in human classical eyelid conditioning.Dennis L. Foth & Willard N. Runquist - 1970 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 84 (2):244.
Performance in eyelid conditioning following changes in reinforcement schedule.Willard N. Runquist - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 65 (6):617.
Backward conditioning and UCR latency.Marvin Homzie, Edward Rutledge & Milton Trapold - 1964 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 67 (4):387.
Transfer of eyelid conditioning from instrumental to classical reinforcement and vice versa.David A. Grant, Neal E. A. Kroll, Barry Kantowitz, Michael J. Zajano & Kenneth B. Solberg - 1969 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 82 (3):503.
Auditory and autonomic tests of the preparatory-adaptive-response interpretation of classical aversive conditioning.John J. Furedy - 1973 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 99 (2):280.
Response shaping at long interstimulus intervals in classical eyelid conditioning.William F. Prokasy, Harvey C. Ebel & Donald D. Thompson - 1963 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 66 (2):138.
Operant conditioning, extinction, and periodic reinforcement in relation to concentration of sucrose used as reinforcing agent.Norman Guttman - 1953 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 46 (4):213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2016-06-30

Downloads
11 (#1,105,752)

6 months
6 (#522,885)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Implicit learning from a computer-science perspective.Peter Kugel - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):556-557.
Implicit learning: What does it all mean?David R. Shanks & Mark F. St John - 1996 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 19 (3):557-558.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references