Dissertation, Pathways School of Philosophy (2009)

Mysticism claims of its logical scheme that it is Euclidean, that from its first axiom or principle the remainder of its doctrine follows, but it makes this claim in so many languages and in such a variety of obscure and self-contradictory ways that it is difficult to discern how this could be possible, and it is rarely considered a plausible claim in metaphysics. I believe it is plausible, and in this essay I try to explain why.
Keywords Metaphysical Neutralism  Mysticism  Nondualism  Naturalistic Dualism  Theory of Emptiness  Dialethism  Metaphysics  Consciousness
Categories (categorize this paper)
Edit this record
Mark as duplicate
Export citation
Find it on Scholar
Request removal from index
Revision history

Download options

PhilArchive copy

 PhilArchive page | Other versions
External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
Through your library

References found in this work BETA

No references found.

Add more references

Citations of this work BETA

No citations found.

Add more citations

Similar books and articles


Added to PP index

Total views
844 ( #4,799 of 2,343,714 )

Recent downloads (6 months)
43 ( #15,038 of 2,343,714 )

How can I increase my downloads?


My notes