Hume, Bentham, and the Social Contract

Utilitas 5 (1):87- (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Hume famously argues that Social Contract theory collapses into a form of utilitarianism. Bentham endorses Hume's argument. I show that, if Hume's argument refutes Social Contract theory, it equally undermines Bentham's own utilitarian account of political obligation. This discussion is used to illustrate a more general thesis that there is no single problem of political obligation, but different problems for different theorists

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive



    Upload a copy of this work     Papers currently archived: 99,445

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Binding Force of Promises.Earl W. Spurgin Jr - 1995 - Dissertation, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Modern Social Contract Theory.Albert Weale - 2020 - New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
John Locke's Contractarian Theory of Political Obligation.Yoen-kyo Jung - 1992 - Dissertation, The University of Rochester
Hume and Kant on the social contract.Jeffrie G. Murphy - 1978 - Philosophical Studies 33 (1):65 - 79.
Hume and the social contract.P. F. Brownsey - 1978 - Philosophical Quarterly 28 (111):132-148.
More than Consent: Kant on the Function of the Social Contract.Larry Krasnoff - 2018 - Las Torres de Lucca. International Journal of Political Philosophy 7 (13):45-62.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-30

Downloads
212 (#109,205)

6 months
15 (#164,579)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jonathan Wolff
Oxford University