Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 21 (4):379-404 (2011)
AbstractSlippery slope arguments have been important in the euthanasia debate for at least half a century. In 1957 the Cambridge legal scholar Glanville Williams wrote a controversial book, The Sanctity of Life and the Criminal Law, in which he presented the decriminalizing of euthanasia as a modern liberal proposal taking its rightful place alongside proposals to decriminalize contraception, sterilization, abortion, and attempted suicide (all of which the book also advocated).1 Opposition to these reforms was in turn presented as exclusively religious and particularly Roman Catholic. Thus Williams asserted that "euthanasia can be condemned only according to religious opinion" (1957, p. 312).The following year, in ..
Added to PP
Historical graph of downloads
Similar books and articles
Consequentialism and the Slippery Slope: A Response to Clark.Jonathan Hughes - 2000 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 17 (2):213–220.
‘Debating the Morality and Legality of Medically Assisted Dying’. Critical Notice of Emily Jackson and John Keown, Debating Euthanasia. Oxford: Hart Publishing, 2012. [REVIEW]Robert Young - 2013 - Criminal Law and Philosophy 7 (1):151-160.
Euthanasia, Ethics, and Public Policy: An Argument Against Legalisation.John Keown - 2002 - Cambridge University Press.
The Empirical Slippery Slope From Voluntary to Non-Voluntary Euthanasia.Penney Lewis - 2007 - Journal of Law, Medicine and Ethics 35 (1):197-210.
The Slippery Slope Argument Against the Legalization of Voluntary Euthanasia.W. H. Nielsen - 1987 - Journal of Social Philosophy 18 (1):12-27.
Peter Singer and Non-Voluntary 'Euthanasia': Tripping Down the Slippery Slope.Suzanne Uniacke & H. J. Mccloskey - 1992 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 9 (2):203-219.
The Legislation of Active Voluntary Euthanasia in Australia: Will the Slippery Slope Prove Fatal?I. H. Kerridge & K. R. Mitchell - 1996 - Journal of Medical Ethics 22 (5):273-278.
Easeful Death: Is There a Case for Assisted Dying?Mary Warnock - 2008 - Oxford University Press.
Aiming to Kill: The Ethics of Suicide and Euthanasia.Nigel Biggar - 2004 - Pilgrim Press.
Euthanasia and the Slippery Slope.Michael Clark - 1998 - Journal of Applied Philosophy 15 (3):251–257.
Euthanasia in The Netherlands--Down the Slippery Slope?R. Gillon - 1999 - Journal of Medical Ethics 25 (1):3-4.
Arguing Along the Slippery Slope of Human Embryo Research.Jeanne Salmon Freeman - 1996 - Journal of Medicine and Philosophy 21 (1):61-81.
References found in this work
No references found.
Citations of this work
Euthanasia Laws, Slippery Slopes, and (Un)Reasonable Precaution.Friderik Klampfer - 2019 - Prolegomena: Časopis Za Filozofiju 18 (2):121-147.
Parity Arguments for ‘Physician Aid-in-Dying’ for Psychiatric Disorders: Their Structure and Limits.Scott Y. H. Kim, Chris Gastmans & Marie E. Nicolini - 2019 - American Journal of Bioethics 19 (10):3-7.
Apostles of Suicide: Theological Precedent for Christian Support of ‘Assisted Dying’.David Albert Jones - 2016 - Studies in Christian Ethics 29 (3):331-338.
Counting Cases of Termination of Life Without Request: New Dances with Data.Govert den Hartogh - 2020 - Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 29 (3):395-402.