David Bourget (Western Ontario)
David Chalmers (ANU, NYU)
Rafael De Clercq
Ezio Di Nucci
Jonathan Jenkins Ichikawa
Jack Alan Reynolds
Learn more about PhilPapers
Philosophy in the Contemporary World 1 (2):11-18 (1994)
Multiculturalism has not yet systematically addressed, much less challenged, dominant approaches to poverty and welfare reform. This lacuna must be rectified since the widespread poverty experienced by people of color poses a substantive threat to the development of a truly inclusive and multicultural society. Present approaches to poverty, defined in the context of welfare reform, are defective for three reasons: First, welfare reform basically aims to reduce welfare “dependency” by moving so-called able-bodied welfare recipients off welfare and into the labor market. This project seems destined to fail given a chronic scarcity of jobs, and especially decent paying jobs. Second, welfare reform does not provide an adequate framework for the general alleviation of poverty since many poor receive little or no welfare assistance. Third, welfare assistance is based on an invidious, stigmatizing distinction between the able-bodied poor (viewed as unworthy and disreputable) and the disabled poor. Thus, given disproportionate rates of poverty among people of color as well as a general (but mistaken) impression that US poverty is principally a “minority” problem, present policies and attitudes toward the poor insure that many people of color will bear the brunt of economic and symbolic marginalization despite gains which accrue to some people of color as the result of greater racial and cultural inclusiveness
|Keywords||Applied Philosophy Contemporary Philosophy|
|Categories||categorize this paper)|
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server
Configure custom proxy (use this if your affiliation does not provide a proxy)
|Through your library|
References found in this work BETA
No references found.
Citations of this work BETA
No citations found.
Similar books and articles
Mary E. Hobgood (1997). Poor Women, Work, and the U.S. Catholic Bishops: Discerning Myth From Reality in Welfare Reform. Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (2):307-333.
Patrick Boleyn‐Fitzgerald (1999). Misfortune, Welfare Reform, and Right‐Wing Egalitarianism. Critical Review 13 (1-2):141-163.
Richard Ashcraft (1992). Liberalism and the Problem of Poverty. Critical Review 6 (4):493-516.
James Sterba (2008). Welfare Libertarianism. Proceedings of the Xxii World Congress of Philosophy 50:765-770.
David J. Mellor (2009). The Sciences of Animal Welfare. Wiley-Blackwell.
Stuart White (2003). The Civic Minimum: On the Rights and Obligations of Economic Citizenship. Oxford University Press.
Donald Broom (2011). A History of Animal Welfare Science. Acta Biotheoretica 59 (2):121-137.
Richard J. Arneson (1997). Egalitarianism and the Undeserving Poor. Journal of Political Philosophy 5 (4):327–350.
Peter Vallentyne (1991). The Problem of Unauthorized Welfare. Noûs 25 (3):295-321.
Steven Daskal (2008). Fellow Citizenship and U.S. Welfare Policy. International Journal of Applied Philosophy 22 (2):281-301.
Katherine Eddy (2006). Welfare Rights and Conflicts of Rights. Res Publica 12 (4):337-356.
Harlan Beckley (1997). Social Science and Theological Ethics: A Response to Mary E. Hobgood. Journal of Religious Ethics 25 (2):343-350.
Added to index2011-01-09
Total downloads15 ( #296,218 of 1,924,998 )
Recent downloads (6 months)1 ( #417,998 of 1,924,998 )
How can I increase my downloads?